Planned Parenthood under fire: Is fetal tissue donation legal?

Three states have launched investigations into the possible sale of aborted fetal tissue by Planned Parenthood.

Georgia, Indiana, and Ohio are investigating Planned Parenthood facilities to determine if they have sold organs from aborted fetuses.

Officials ordered investigations and probes announced by three Republican-led congressional committees following the release of an undercover video made by anti-abortion activists, which shows Planned Parenthood's senior director of medical services discussing procedures for providing fetal body parts to researchers.

The video was recorded during a lunchtime conversation between Deborah Nucatola and anti-abortion activists posing as potential buyers for a human biologics company.

Dr. Nucatola is heard in the video talking about efforts to retrieve organs during an abortion procedure. She also gives a range of monetary procurement estimates, but at one point she says “Nobody should be 'selling' tissue. That's just not the goal here.”

Planned Parenthood said the monetary sums mentioned by Nucatola were for reimbursement of the clinics' costs in handling the tissue donations. The non-profit which provides abortions and other reproductive health services also noted that Nucatola had been "reprimanded,” but did not elaborate.

The organization's president, Cecile Richards, apologized for the tone of some of Nucatola's recorded statements. In a statement published on Tuesday she dismissed the claims of selling fetal organs:

In health care, patients sometimes want to donate tissue to scientific research that can help lead to medical breakthroughs, such as treatments and cures for serious diseases. Women at Planned Parenthood who have abortions are no different. At several of our health centers, we help patients who want to donate tissue for scientific research, and we do this just like every other high-quality health care provider does -- with full, appropriate consent from patients and under the highest ethical and legal standards. There is no financial benefit for tissue donation for either the patient or for Planned Parenthood.  In some instances, actual costs, such as the cost to transport tissue to leading research centers, are reimbursed, which is standard across the medical field.

The same day, the California-based Center for Medical Progress, which shot the video covertly last year, said the Planned Parenthood statement makes clear that the organization “aborted fetal parts are harvested” and the organization clinics, and “money is exchanged in connection with this." It also added:

The Center for Medical Progress has obtained an advertisement to Planned Parenthood clinics from StemExpress, LLC, one of the major purchasers of Planned Parenthood’s aborted fetal tissue. This flyer advertises 4 different times the financial benefit that Planned Parenthood clinics can receive from supplying fetal tissue, with the words: “Financially Profitable,” “Financial Profits,” “financial benefit to your clinic,” “fiscal growth of your own clinic.” The advertisement carries an endorsement from Planned Parenthood Medical Director Dr. Dorothy Furgerson.

Donation of fetal tissue for medical research purchases is legal. However, purchase of tissue, solicitation or acceptance of tissue as directed donation for use in transplantation and solicitation or acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes is unlawful if the transfer affects interstate commerce, according to federal law. A person who violates the laws will be fined or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.