Does your phone know if you're depressed?

People who spend more time at home or on their phones are more likely to be depressed – but it is unclear if one causes the other.

Eric Risberg/AP/File
A salesperson demonstrates the new Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge at a Best Buy store in San Francisco, April 10, 2015. New evidence suggests there may be a correlation between cell phone use and symptoms of depression.

Information from your smartphone may be able to predict symptoms of depression, a new study found.

Researchers from Northwestern University tracked participants’ movements and the amount of time they used their smartphones daily. Though no cause was determined, the study found that those who spent more time on their phones and more time in a single location were more likely to exhibit depressive symptoms, such as sadness, hopelessness, disturbances in sleep and appetite, or difficulty concentrating.

"People are likely, when on their phones, to avoid thinking about things that are troubling, painful feelings, or difficult relationships," said senior author David Mohr in a Northwestern University press release. "It’s an avoidance behavior we see in depression."

Using cell phone data, researchers could identify those with depressive symptoms with 87 percent accuracy. Cell phone use averaged 68 minutes a day in participants who were diagnosed as depressed, and only 17 minutes a day in those who were not.

The study did not track how people were using their phones – only when, and for how long – but Professor Mohr speculated that people with depression were more likely to be playing games and surfing the Web than talking to friends.

But the study’s limitations prevented the researchers from identifying a causal relationship. Data were analyzed from only 28 participants, and the study relied on self-reported symptoms as the control against which phone data was measured.

In other words, the study could not prove that using your phone more often causes depression, or vice versa, or whether both are caused by something else.

Other research has also investigated the relationship between devices and depression. A 2014 paper published in the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology cited two studies linking Facebook use and depression.

The evidence suggested that "people feel depressed after spending a great deal of time on Facebook because they feel badly when comparing themselves to others," reported the researchers.

It’s no secret that online personas present a heavily edited, Photoshopped version of reality – and losing that perspective can be disastrous for one’s self esteem.

"For obvious reasons, people do not advertise their negative traits on their social profiles, nor do they [post] unflattering pictures," a PsychCentral blogger wrote last year. "We are often fooled into believing other people’s lives are much better than our own.”

While the recent study could not prove if staying at home for long periods or spending too much time in the digital world caused depression, the correlation could be useful in "passively" and "unobtrusively" detecting symptoms, said Mohr.

Sohrob Saeb, lead author on the study, pointed out that their research can help people avoid behaviors linked to depression.

"We will see if we can reduce symptoms of depression by encouraging people to visit more locations throughout the day, have a more regular routine, spend more time in a variety of places, or reduce mobile phone use," said Dr. Saeb.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.