Concerns over Iran deal: Have 'red lines' become 'green lights?'

The historic passage of a deal with Iran has many in Congress worried that the effort to limit Iran's nuclear program may have the opposite effect.

The nuclear deal with Iran announced Tuesday sparked hostility and skepticism from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress, who argue that the deal will make it easier for Iran to build a nuclear weapon, not harder.

Under the agreement, which took several months and extended deadlines to negotiate, Iran will curb its nuclear program in exchange for relief from international economic sanctions. While the stated goal of the deal is to avoid a nuclear-armed Iraq and more USintervention in the Middle East, critics are worried it will do just the opposite.

New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez (D) of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations urged Congress in a public statement to review the deal carefully.

“I’m concerned that the deal ultimately legitimizes Iran as a threshold-nuclear state,” he said. “I’m concerned the redlines we drew have turned into green-lights; that Iran will be required only to limit rather than eliminate its nuclear program, while the international community will be required to lift the sanctions, and that it doesn’t provide for anytime-any-place inspections of suspected sites. The bottom line is: The deal doesn’t end Iran’s nuclear program – it preserves it.”

Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky and House Speaker John Boehner (R) released statements expressing similar doubts. Boehner went as far as to say, “If in fact it’s as bad a deal as I think it is at this moment, we’ll do everything we can to stop it.”

Legislators have not actually seen the text of the agreement yet; at this point, their opinions are based on limited information. California Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) said in a statement she believes the deal has significant potential.

"If this agreement is what the administration says it is, it is a major, historic diplomatic breakthrough," she said.

Once Congress receives a copy of the agreement, it will have 60 days to review and vote on it, or take no action. If Congress votes it down, President Obama said Tuesday he would veto the rejection, which Congress could only overrule with a two-thirds majority.

Congress could also undermine the deal by passing new sanctions on Iran or by revoking Obama’s authority to waive earlier sanctions.

To preserve the deal, Obama could use executive power to offer sanctions relief without Congress’s approval.

Congress is unlikely to take any action before the August recess, but the foreign relations committees are expected to schedule hearings soon.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Concerns over Iran deal: Have 'red lines' become 'green lights?'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0714/Concerns-over-Iran-deal-Have-red-lines-become-green-lights
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe