Hazing 101: How do college Greek organizations stem the tide?

A California college student died last July during a fraternity organized 18-mile hike for pledges. One year later, his family is still looking for answers. 

Damian Dovarganes/AP/file
In this Sept. 5, 2014, file photo, relatives of the late Armando Villa react, as California State University, Northridge CSUN President Dianne Harrison, reads a statement regarding Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity activities that lead to the death of CSUN student Armando Villa, at a news conference at the CSUN campus in Northridge, Calif.

On July 1, 2014, California State University-Northridge student Armando Villa went on an 18-mile hike in the scorching heat as part of a pledge activity for Pi Kappa Phi.

Pledges were reportedly forced to wear inadequate shoes and given little water. Villa collapsed during the hike and later died.

According to The Associated Press, Villa's mother and stepfather recently filed a lawsuit against the university, school administrators, and the fraternity, citing negligence and hazing. 

Many colleges and universities have anti-hazing policies that are grounded in their state’s anti-hazing laws. The website for California State Northridge refers to the California Penal Code on Hazing, which gives a definition of hazing as follows:

 “…any method of initiation or pre-initiation into a student organization or student body...which is likely to cause serious bodily injury to any former, current, or prospective student of any school, community college, university, or other educational institution in this state.”

But occasionally, the same institutions that clearly outline state law leave loved ones of hazing victims in the dark.

Many universities respond to hazing incidents in their Greek organizations by suspending, either temporarily or permanently, the fraternity or sorority responsible.

At Washington and Lee University in Virginia, a member of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity used a Taser on a recruit in March and the chapter was suspended for three years. The student who used the Taser was not suspended from the university or criminally charged, according to university spokesman Brian Eckert.

Is closing a fraternity chapter of Greek organizations an effective way to stop hazing incidents on campus?

There may be other steps that need to be taken, says a 2008 study by the University of Maine. The study claims that more students perceive positive rather than negative outcomes of hazing and that students reported limited exposure to hazing prevention efforts that extended beyond a “hazing is not tolerated” approach.

The study makes several recommendations to university staff and personnel:

  • Hazing prevention events should be designed to include all organizations on campus
  • Send a clear, strong message that hazing will not be accepted on campus and that those participating in it will be held accountable
  • Broaden the groups targeted for hazing prevention education to all university community members, including professors, administrators, and family members
  • Intervention and prevention methods should be research based and undergo regular assessment
  • Introduce hazing prevention efforts early in students' education
  • Avoid one time presentations of anti-hazing policies. Education should be comprehensive. 

Universities have gotten the message and some have started more active and educational anti-hazing campaigns. In April, the student government at Louisiana State University allocated $5,000 to fund an anti-hazing video and campaign.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.