South Carolina's legislature has support to remove Confederate flag

A poll of lawmakers determined that both the South Carolina House and Senate has achieved the two-thirds majority needed to take the flag down. 

Bruce Smith/AP
Supporters of keeping the Confederate battle flag flying at a Confederate monument at the South Carolina Statehouse wave flags during a rally in front of the statehouse in Columbia, S.C., on Saturday, June 27, 2015.

After nearly two weeks of upheaval revolving around the Confederate battle flag, the majority of South Carolina lawmakers wish to remove it from the grounds of the state house.

In response to a poll administered by Charleston's Post and Courier, 32 senators and 83 House members said the flag should be taken down, reaching the two-thirds majority needed for its removal.

“It’s causing too many problems,” Rep. Mike Forrester (R) of Spartanburg told the Post and Courier. “I think it needs to be in a place of honor, but probably not on the state house grounds. 

South Carolina lawmakers are slated to convene on July 6 to discuss the issue and consider proposals for the flag’s removal.

The Civil War-era flag has sparked a national outcry over its divisive roots after a violent June 17 attack in which nine black parishioners at the historic Emanuel AME Church in Charleston were gunned down. Police have charged a white 21-year-old, Dylann Roof with the crimes. Mr. Roof had posted photos of himself flaunting the flag on a site called The Last Rhodesian, which immediately surfaced online following the shooting. 

Within days after the incident, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham told CNN the flag isn’t to blame for Roof’s actions. “It’s him,” he said. “Not the flag.” A week later, he said he saw the flag as a “road block” for his state, siding with Gov. Nikki Haley as she called for the flag’s removal from the Capitol grounds.

Since then, several celebrities, major corporations and politicians have denounced the flag and other Confederate iconography. President Obama called it "a reminder of systemic oppression and racial subjugation” during the funeral for Rev. Clementa Pinckney, the slain pastor of the AME Church. 

On Saturday, two North Carolina women unhooked the Confederate flag from the flagpole on the north side of the South Carolina Statehouse and were charged for defacing a monument, according to a Department of Public Safety statement. Both have since been released on bail.

The flag was placed atop the state house dome in 1961, as part of a series of gestures on behalf of Southern politicians rejecting integration and the civil rights movement, according to Yale Law School’s James Forman, Jr. In 2000, black lawmakers and the majority Republicans reached a compromise and moved it to a flagpole next to a Confederate monument near the Capitol, The Post and Courier reported. The agreement also required that a two-thirds majority was needed to move the flag.

Now that time may have come. But not everyone is pleased.

The Ku Klux Klan is holding a rally at the Statehouse next month to protest the flag’s removal. The Statehouse offers rally space if it’s available, regardless of the occasion. Yet Gov. Nikki Haley criticized the white supremacist group in a statement issued by her press office. “This is our state, and they are not welcome,” she said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.