Global warming debate heats up as Jeb Bush clashes with President Obama

Jeb Bush acknowledges climate change – but doesn't consider a problem of 'highest priority.'

Bryan Snyder/Reuters
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush answers questions from reporters following a business roundtable in Portsmouth, N.H.

The Republican stance on manmade climate change has, historically, been resolute, if not entirely unanimous. Among the likely 2016 GOP contenders, candidates such as Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee have vigorously denied that humans are changing the climate, with Mr. Santorum calling it "a beautifully concocted scheme by liberals."

Not Jeb Bush.

"[T]he climate is changing," the former Florida governor and likely 2016 candidate said in comments made Wednesday, but, he added, it's not clear whether humans are to blame.

As he prepares to launch a presidential campaign, Mr. Bush is taking pains to forge a new, more moderate stance within the GOP on hot button issues on which the party has traditionally been unwavering.

"Look, first of all, the climate is changing. I don't think the science is clear what percentage is man-made and what percentage is natural. It's convoluted. And for the people to say the science is decided on, this is just really arrogant, to be honest with you," he said.

Bush's comments are at odds with many studies on the issue. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said in a 2013 report that it was 95 percent certain that more than half of the warming observed between 1951 and 2010 was manmade. 

But his comments, made during a campaign-centered house party in New Hampshire, were seen as a direct challenge to remarks President Obama made earlier Wednesday when he framed climate change as a threat to security.

"I’m here today to say that climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security, an immediate risk to our national security, and make no mistake, it will impact how our military defends our country," Mr. Obama said Wednesday.

In his State of the Union address earlier this year, Obama also emphasized the importance of climate change.

“No challenge  – no challenge  –  poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change,” Obama said on Jan. 20.

Bush dismissed Obama's claims, but in the same breath, proposed a new, science-forward approach for his party.

"I don't think it's the highest priority," he said of climate change, "I don't think we should ignore it, either. Generally, I think as conservatives we should embrace innovation, embrace technology, embrace science. It's the source of a lot more solutions than any government-imposed idea and sometimes I sense that we pull back from the embrace of these things. We shouldn't. We're the party that should be the party of discovery, the party of science, the party of innovation and tear down the barriers so that those things can accelerate in our lives to find solutions for all these things."

In downplaying its threat, Bush may be reflecting the attitudes of a majority of Americans.

A recent Gallup survey on the environment found that "global warming or climate change" ranks last among Americans' environmental concerns, with only 32 percent worrying about it a "great deal," down from 34 percent in 2014.

Nonetheless, in attempting to carve a new, more moderate Republican stance on climate change, Bush continued to get flak from the left – and from the right.

"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that human activity has led to climate change," Democratic National Committee national press secretary Holly Shulman said in a statement. "Ninety-seven percent. But Jeb Bush thinks they're wrong. Who's being intellectually arrogant now?"

But Republicans may not have been any better pleased by his comments than were Democrats. "Is Jeb Bush trying to alienate the Republican-conservative base even more than he already has?" wrote Investor's Business Daily's Kerry Jackson. "His comments about climate change and carbon dioxide emission cuts sure make it look that way."

Reaction to Bush's comments may explain why some Republicans – like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who has acknowledged climate change – are now seen as avoiding the issue.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.