How does tech industry treat women? Discrimination case could expose details.

The case pits an influential investment firm that has backed big tech companies against a former junior partner who says she was denied a promotion after she complained about harassment by a male partner.

Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP/File
In this 2006 photo, Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers senior partner John Doerr poses for a portrait with partner Ellen Pao outside their office in Menlo Park, Calif. A jury is hearing opening arguments in a multimillion-dollar sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Ms. Pao, interim CEO of the news and social media site Reddit, against the prominent Silicon Valley venture capital firm.

Opening statements were being held Tuesday in a high-profile case that is expected to expose details of how the tech industry treats women.

The case pits Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, an influential investment firm that has backed big tech companies such as Google and Amazon, against a former junior partner, Ellen Pao. Ms. Pao, who is now the interim chief executive officer of the social media company Reddit, accuses the firm of gender discrimination and says she was denied a promotion after she complained about harassment by a male partner.

By now it is widely accepted that tech companies have a gender problem. Only about 30 percent of employees at big technology companies are female, and a Newsweek article last month described the culture in Silicon Valley as “savagely misogynistic.” Now the question is whether this case will make employers in the industry rethink the way women are treated in the workplace or whether it will do little to change the status quo.

“The proceedings could resonate widely: A finding of liability will be seen as a vindication of women’s complaints about the high-tech world; failure of the suit might supply ammunition to those who feel gender issues are being overplayed,” writes David Streitfeld in The New York Times.

Some are hoping that the case will be a wake-up call for companies in the tech industry. Anything that gets people talking about the issues is important, says David Leighton, president of Women in Technology International (WITI), a Los Angeles-based organization that supports women in the tech sector.

Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers "has been one of the top firms in Silicon Valley. If they really get it and start to make changes, that could make a difference,” Mr. Leighton says.

The attempts that tech firms have made for more inclusiveness in the workplace haven't always been well received, he notes.

“All of these companies are investing suddenly in diversity, giving managers incentives to hire women, but it alienates everyone when you approach it in a numbers-driven way. Why would a woman want to be hired because the man will get a bonus to hire her? It creates a bad environment," Leighton says. "Companies need to begin to leverage gender differences in the workplace and realize that hiring women is good for business.”

Still, while the issues are being battled in court, women are leaving the tech industry, points out the leadership at WITI. A 2014 report from the Diana Project, a research effort on female entrepreneurs, found that the total share of female partners at venture capital firms had declined to 6 percent from 10 percent in 1999. "So far, no [tech] company has found a solution for retaining women," writes Tracey Lien in a Los Angeles Times article.

In court filings, Pao said that her status at the firm deteriorated after she ended an affair that she had been pressured into with a married partner who has since also left the firm. She said she was denied raises and a promotion after he and the firm began retaliating against her, according to Reuters, which cited the court filings.

The company says that Pao’s performance did not merit a promotion and that there was no discrimination involved in the decision not to promote her.

In court filings, the firm signaled it would portray Pao as one caught up in office drama. "For some reason, there's always some team controversy swirling around Ellen," one of her annual reviews stated, according to the filings, as reported by the Associated Press.

The trial, which is taking place in San Francisco Superior Court, is expected to last a month.

The case has already brought widespread attention to the gender issue in Silicon Valley and trailblazed a path for other lawsuits. After Pao filed her suit in 2012, female employees at several other venture firms filed similar cases that were eventually settled. 

Now, many say that Pao’s suit could be a big deal.

“I think it could have a huge impact,” said Traci Hinden, a San Francisco attorney who represents employees in discrimination cases. A half century after passage of the federal Civil Rights Act, and six years after Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter act to help women sue for wage discrimination, “equal pay and equal advancement for women are not being shown,” Ms. Hinden told the San Francisco Chronicle.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How does tech industry treat women? Discrimination case could expose details.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today