Patricia Arquette fights for gender pay equity at the Oscars

"Boyhood" actress uses Oscar's acceptance speech to fight for wage equality and women's rights.

Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP
Patricia Arquette, winner of the award for best actress in a supporting role for 'Boyhood,' attends the Governors Ball after the Oscars on Sunday, Feb. 22, 2015, in Los Angeles.

In the midst of the remarkably uneventful Academy Awards show  on Sunday, actress Patricia Arquette seized the opportunity during her acceptance speech to deliver an impassioned plea for wage equality and women’s rights.

She began by thanking the cast and crew of “Boyhood”  for their hard work and support, before launching into message.

“To every woman who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else's equal rights,” Arquette said in her acceptance speech. “It’s our time to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America.”

The speech spurred the largest round of applause of the night, led by an enthusiastic Meryl Streep (“Into The Woods”), whom Arquette beat out for Best Supporting Actress, and Jennifer Lopez.

The speech was particularly poignant considering that the US gender wage gap has remained unchanged since “Boyhood” began filming in 2002, according to the National Journal.

Women are paid on average only 78 percent of what men in the same jobs are paid. While this is worse in some states than in others, it is a reality in all 50 states and women of color face an even greater wage gap, according to the American Association of University Women.

The speech won Arquette additional nominations, including a few for President of the United States.

Arquette won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress for her role as Mason’s mom in “Boyhood,” the 12-year-long epic depicting adolescence at its ugliest and motherhood at its most difficult. Throughout the film, her character struggles with raising her children amid poverty and divorce, balancing her career and family, and handling an existential crisis brought on by her children reaching adulthood themselves.

For Arquette, the timeline of the movie meant unapologetically aging on screen, in front of an industry that routinely dismisses actresses over 40.

“I’ve had people come up to me and say ‘oh my God, you are so beautifully in this movie. I just thought you looked so beautiful at the end,’” Arquette told HitFix. “And then some people will be, like, “How does it feel to watch yourself not be the hot girl anymore?’ or something. It says a lot more about them and their perception, but that’s the great thing about getting older and that’s the great thing about being around the block 100 million times by the time this comes out.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.