Ginseng or a rice filler? Major retailers sell fraudulent supplements

The New York State attorney general is cracking down on supplements sold at Target, Walmart, GNC, and Walgreens. A study found that four out of five supplements do not contain the ingredient on the label. 

Charles Krupa/AP/File
Walgreens, GNC, Target, and Walmart received cease-and-desist letters from the New York State attorney general's office for selling fraudulent natural supplements.

It may come as a shock to the tens of millions of Americans who buy herbal supplements to find out that their “ginseng” is nothing more than powdered garlic and rice.

On Monday, the New York State attorney general’s office sent cease-and-desist letters to four major supplement retailers, including Target, GNC, Walgreens, and Walmart after discovering that four out of five tested supplement products did not contain any of the herbs on their labels. The New York Times reported that many of the "medicinal herb" pills contained little more than cheap fillers, such as powdered rice, asparagus, and houseplants.

About 50 percent of Americans take supplements, annually investing about $28 billion, according to the University of California, Berkeley. A 2013 study from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research estimated there are about 65,000 dietary supplements on the market consumed by more than 150 million Americans, according to the Associated Press, creating a lucrative industry.

But are consumers actually getting the supplements listed on the labels?

Unlike prescription drugs, natural supplements do not require FDA approval. The New York State attorney general’s office’s crackdown on retailers is the first time legal action has been threatened for selling misleading products.

"Mislabeling, contamination and false advertising are illegal," said Eric T. Schneiderman, the state attorney general, reported the New York Times. "They also pose unacceptable risks to New York families — especially those with allergies to hidden ingredients."

While supplement labels are misleading consumers, they also are putting consumers in compromising situations. For example, Walmart’s ginkgo biloba supplement contained mostly powdered radish, houseplants, and wheat, despite a label claiming it as wheat and gluten-free. Unlisted fillers were also present in GNC brands, including powdered legumes, which fall into the class of plants (which also includes peanuts and soybeans) that are may be hazardous for those diagnosed with allergies.

The investigation included the testing of 78 bottles of the leading brands of herbal supplements from the four retail chains across New York State. An agency analyzed the products – including ginkgo biloba, St. John’s wort, ginseng, garlic, echinacea, saw palmetto, and valerian root – using the same DNA process used to discover labeling fraud in the seafood industry.

The testing was performed by DNA bar coding experts from Clarkson University in Potsdam, N.Y. They tested three to four samples of each of the supplements purchased, and each sample was tested five times. Overall, 390 tests involving 78 samples were performed, according to NewsmaxHealth.com. Only 21 percent of test results verified DNA from plants listed on the labels. Walmart showed only 4 percent.

"This investigation makes one thing abundantly clear: The old adage 'buyer beware' may be especially true for consumers of herbal supplements," Schneiderman said, reported the Associated Press. He demanded companies provide detailed information on processing, production, quality control, and testing for supplements sold at their stores.

Dr. Pieter Cohen, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and an expert on supplement safety, aired his concerns about the attorney general’s extreme test results. He said they were hard to accept and that it was possible they had failed to detect some of the plants found in the supplements. Regardless, the study has major implications.

"If this data is accurate, then it is an unbelievably devastating indictment of the industry," said Dr. Cohen, reported the New York Times.

In a statement, Walgreens spokesperson James Graham announced they will be removing these products from their shelves nationwide until they conduct the necessary research. Walmart spokesperson Brian Nick stated they are immediately reaching out to suppliers to take appropriate action. GNC spokesperson Laura Brophy said they will cooperate with the attorney general’s office, but that they still stand by "the quality, purity, and potency of all ingredients listed on the labels of [their] private label products." Target has yet to release a statement.

Whatever comes of this situation, the attorney general’s office has shed light on regulation deficiencies and needed improvement when it comes to labeling ingredients on supplement labels.

"The absence of DNA does not explain the high percentage of contaminants found in these products," said Marty Mack, an executive deputy attorney general in New York, reported the New York Times. "The burden is now with the industry to prove what is in these supplements."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.