University of California students – and Gov. Jerry Brown – protest tuition increase

The Board of Regents of the University of California has approved a tuition increase that will raise tuition for many in-state students to $15,564 by 2019. Gov. Jerry Brown wants new money-saving measures first.

Eric Risberg/AP
University of California police push student protesters back behind barricades outside a meeting of the university Board of Regents Wednesday in San Francisco. On Thursday, the regents approved a tuition increase.

In the face of protests from students and Gov. Jerry Brown, the Board of Regents of the University of California voted Thursday to approve a 28 percent tuition hike, marking the university system's first tuition increase in three years. 

The increase was proposed by UC President Janet Napolitano. The regents voted 14 to 7 to raise tuition by as much as 5 percent per year for each of the next five years unless the state of California is able to budget more money for the 10-campus system. For many undergraduates who live in California, this means they will see their tuition increase by $612 to $12,804 by next fall and to $15,564 by 2019. 

"This is a plan that is integral not only to the stability, but also to the vitality, of the University of California," Ms. Napolitano said at the meeting, according to The Daily Californian, a student-run newspaper.

On Wednesday, protesters outside the building in San Francisco where the regents were meeting tried to force their way through police security lines, resulting in one arrest, Bloomberg reported.

Regents had to shout their votes over chants of "Hey, hey, ho, tuition hikes have got to go." Some students called for Napolitano's resignation. Demonstrators expressed their disappointment with the ease with which the regents seemed to approve the tuition increase. 

"Seeing you all come in laughing and smiling and talking about stuff made me sick to my stomach," UC Davis student Amelia Itnyre told the board through tears before the vote. "Students, we aren't just angry, we are sad. You should be crying, you should be praying, you should be figuring out what you are going to do to fix this."

Napolitano, for her part, said the plan is necessary to maintain student enrollment, financial aid, and a strong academic environment in the face of "massive state disinvestment." 

"While our commitment to cost-cutting continues, the plain fact is that tuition must now be back on the table,” Napolitano said, according to The Daily Californian.

But Governor Brown (D), who was elected to a fourth term this month and who serves as president of the regents, voted against the hike, saying he wants to create a task force to look into ways to make the UC budget go further by educating more students in less time. Such options could include offering more online classes and making it easier for community college students who transfer to a UC campus to complete their degrees.

Brown said prior to the vote that the university system's $7 billion budget is now about 27 percent larger than before he took office in 2011. 

UC Executive Vice President Nathan Brostrom, who oversees the system's budget, told the committee that only students with annual family incomes above $175,000 would pay the entire increase and that more than half of all UC students would continue paying no tuition thanks to financial aid. 

 This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to University of California students – and Gov. Jerry Brown – protest tuition increase
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today