New York City bill seeks to stop federal immigration 'dragnet'

A New York City Council bill announced Thursday would put strict conditions on when the city would hand over people to federal immigration authorities.

Seth Wenig/AP
Riker's Island jail in New York. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has an office here.

New York City is set to join a host of other jurisdictions in limiting its cooperation with federal authorities in the name of expanded immigrants' rights.

A bill announced Thursday would narrow the conditions under which the city would comply with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) requests to detain people.

Supporters see the bill as a rebuke to federal policies that they say are too aggressively anti-immigrant, and they hope it will act as a model for other big cities. Critics say it will allow for the release potentially dangerous criminals.

The bill stipulates that the city would not honor an ICE request to detain an immigrant unless the request met two conditions: It includes a warrant from a federal judge, and the immigrant has been convicted of a "violent or serious crime."

The issue arises because of ICE practices. ICE can request a temporary detainer to hold someone in jail whom a court has released. During that time, ICE can extract the immigrant and place him in federal detention. 

Under the new bill, ICE could still pursue immigration charges against any immigrant. But New York would only allow ICE to use its jails in very narrow circumstances.

"Nothing here prevents immigration [authorities] from separately pursuing immigration penalties," says Nancy Morawetz, a professor at New York University Law School. "But the idea is to separate them. When they're mixed, there are a lot of unintended consequences, and that's what we've seen in New York." 

The issue is a significant one for a city with such a large immigrant population. If passed, the bill could drastically reduce the number of immigrants arrested in New York City.

About 250 jurisdictions around the country have decided not to honor ICE detainer requests. But New York sees itself as adding significant heft to the trend.

"By further limiting ICE's role in the detention and deportation of immigrant New Yorkers, we set the national standard for the treatment of our immigrant population," said New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, who is set to introduce the bill next week, in a statement. "Families will no longer be needlessly torn apart by ICE's dragnet enforcement efforts."

The bill would also close the ICE office on Rikers Island, the primary jail complex for New York City. Immigration advocates say the agency uses its presence there to find people to deport. 

Mayor Bill de Blasio has said he supports the bill. A representative for the ICE New York field office declined to comment. 

Thursday's bill would extend previous New York City legislation that has sought to protect people with no criminal record from being turned over to immigration authorities. Despite past efforts, about 4,000 people are turned over each year, according to Alisa Wellek, co-executive director of the Immigrant Defense Project and an advocate for the bill.

The new bill offers "increased clarity that it may be unconstitutional to hold people without a warrant," Ms. Wellek says. People with detainers are held an average of 134 days, more than twice as long as a citizen, she says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to New York City bill seeks to stop federal immigration 'dragnet'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today