NSA leaks: Is your selfie filed away in a massive government database?

The latest published leaks by Edward Snowden signal that the National Security Agency is mining photographs from online communications for use in facial recognition software. The NSA declines comment.

Jeff Chiu/AP/File
A Facebook employee walks past a sign at Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., in this March 15, 2013 file photo. Responding to the latest published leaks by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, NSA spokeswoman Vanee Vines said that the NSA has not tapped into state drivers license databases, but declined comment on whether the agency was harvesting photos of Americans via Facebook.

Two years ago, Facebook users wary of posting their pictures online were ridiculed for fearing that Big Brother might be watching.

But leaked documents indicating that the National Security Agency has been compiling a massive database of photographs gleaned from online communications for use in its facial recognition software suggest those “conspiracy theorists” had good reason to be concerned.

According to the documents, leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and reported Saturday by The New York Times, the NSA routinely scours social media, e-mail, video conferences, and other communications for photographs to add to the agency’s ever-growing image database.

“The agency intercepts ‘millions of images per day’ – including about 55,000 ‘facial recognition quality images,’ ” the Times reported.

NSA spokeswoman Vanee Vines defended the practices as a vital aspect in combating terrorism in a digital age.

“We would not be doing our job if we didn’t seek ways to continuously improve the precision of signals intelligence activities – aiming to counteract the efforts of valid foreign intelligence targets to disguise themselves or conceal plans to harm the United States and its allies,” Ms. Vines told the Times.

While Vines said that the NSA has not tapped into state drivers license databases, she declined to comment on whether the agency was harvesting photos of Americans via Facebook.

The documents suggest that the NSA has aggressively pursued facial recognition technology under the Obama administration, the Times reports. The documents also indicate that the agency has considered adding iris scans to its phone and e-mail surveillance programs. Officials declined to comment on whether the agency already employs such technology.

In the words of TechCrunch’s Natasha Lomas, “That ‘no comment’ speaks volumes.”

The report that the NSA is stockpiling images is just the latest in a series of accusations made by Mr. Snowden since 2013 that the NSA has been using the Internet to gather data en masse.

Nearly two-dozen tech companies and civil liberties groups launched a new campaign to “Reset the Net,” Wired reported last month.

““We use the Internet to be ourselves, but governments are building a prison around it. We have to stop them,” states a video on the resetthenet.org. “Together on June 5, one year after Snowden’s first NSA story, we all take one powerful step to turn off government spying and turn on freedom.”

The campaign calls on developers to install additional encryption protections and users to enable “NSA-resistant” privacy tools.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.