Iron Man: Super suit trying to jump from the movie screen to the battlefield

Special ops forces may be able to don, in a few years, an 'Iron Man-like' suit equipped with a liquid armor exoskeleton, smart fabrics that stop bleeding, and enhanced sensory capabilities.

Tamara Lush/AP
Michael Fieldson, the civilian project manager for the Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit at McDill Air Force Base, looks at sketches of the body armor exoskeleton during the Special Operations Forces Industry Conference in Tampa, Fla. Elite US special operations forces may be a few short years away from donning a similar suit.

Since the release of the first “Iron Man” movie in 2008, little – and grown-up – boys all over America have tried to replicate the suit of armor that transforms the fictional Tony Stark into a superhero. In just a few short years, US special operations forces may get to try out the real deal.

Engineers at the Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit, or TALOS, project are developing a suit of armor that would provide superhuman ballistic protection and would offer the soldiers digitized information about their surroundings and battlefield conditions. Plans for the suit include a liquid armor exoskeleton, smart fabrics that stop bleeding, enhanced sensory capabilities, and Google-glass like visuals. (Superhuman strength and ability to fly not included.)

Officials at the US Special Operations Command at MacDill Air Force Base (SOCOM) in Tampa expect to see prototypes in June and hope to outfit high-risk units with the suits by 2018.

SOCOM’s deputy for acquisition, James Geurts, told the Associated Press that the futuristic technology could help reduce casualties in the field.

“We’ve lost a lot of guys to gunshot wounds and explosions,” he told AP. “If there’s anything I can do to more rapidly field technology, give better protection, better capability, any progress, I think we’ve done well.”

In May 2013, the military issued a broad request for technology demonstration submissions from private industry, individuals, government labs, academia, and research and development organizations, with the expectation that TALOS would be a technological collaboration between a wide range of institutions and individuals.

Several of the companies that answered that call are on hand in Tampa this week for the International Special Operations Forces Industry Conference. Some of the military’s top brass are expected to speak, including SOCOM's commander, Adm. William McRaven, who has been widely credited with initiating the project.

Admiral McRaven has been the voice of the project on promotional videos produced by SOCOM that call for everyone from “local garage tinkerers” to skilled engineers to join the effort.

“While I am committed to this, at the end of the day I need you in industry to figure out how you are going to partner with each other to do something that is right for America,” McRaven said in one video. “I am very committed to this because I’d like that last operator that we lost to be the last one that we ever lose in this fight or the fight of the future and I think we can get there.”

However, it is unlikely that the suit would become standard issue equipment, even for Special Operation Forces, according to TALOS’s civilian project manager, Michael Fieldson.

“We really don’t think everybody in SOF and certainly not everybody in the army would end up with one of these things,” Mr. Fieldson told the Center for a New American Security in October. “It would be cost-prohibitive.”

Decisions about who gets the new armor and who doesn’t are sure to be fraught with controversy.

Robert Scales, a former major general and two-star commandant of the US Army War College, told the Center for a New American Security that he would like to see this equipment issued to all ground services.

“A dead soldier from the 10th Mountain Division counts just as much as a dead special operator,” General Scales said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.