Do e-cigarettes help break the nicotine habit, or make it harder to quit?

One study says electronic cigarettes boost smoking cessation success rates by 60 percent. Another says e-cigarettes merely shift the nicotine habit to another delivery device. What are would-be quitters to do?

|
Dan Henry/Chattanooga Times Free Press/AP
Store manager Jessica Tyron holds an e-cigarette while waiting for a customer at Sweet Creek Vapors in East Ridge, Tenn., on May 9.

Electronic cigarettes may help smokers kick the nicotine habit – or they may not. It depends on which study you read.

A five-year study of 6,000 British smokers conducted by researchers at University College London (UCL) suggests that smokers who use electronic cigarettes to quit smoking have a 60 percent higher success rate than those who use other nicotine-cessation products, such as patches or gum, or those who try to go it alone. The UCL researchers will publish their findings online Tuesday in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Addiction. 

Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigs as they are commonly called, do not burn tobacco but instead heat a liquid nicotine solution, which is vaporized and inhaled by the user. The flameless cigarettes have become increasingly popular in recent years among smokers who are trying to quit, reduce their toxin intake, or satisfy nicotine craving without exposing others to secondhand smoke.

Opponents of e-cigs charge that the devices are a stepping stone, for teenagers, to traditional cigarettes and a crutch for smokers who otherwise would have quit.

Electronic cigarettes could become a valuable tool in smoking cessation, argues Robert West, UCL’s director of tobacco studies, lead author of the study, and Addiction’s editor in chief.

"E-cigarettes could substantially improve public health because of their widespread appeal and the huge health gains associated with stopping smoking," Dr. West said in a statement.

However, a comprehensive review of 83 peer-reviewed papers on electronic cigarettes published last week by researchers at the University of California at San Francisco suggests that e-cigarettes may not be effective as quit-smoking aids.

The UCSF paper, published in the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation on May 12, suggests that smokers relying on e-cigarettes to quit were actually a third less likely to quit smoking than those who did not use e-cigarettes.

While some smokers opt for the leafless cigarettes because they perceive them to be less harmful than tobacco, many e-cigarette users make the switch with the hope of eventually quitting, said Stanton Glanz, director of UCSF’s Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education and co-author of the UCSF paper.

The apparent discrepancy between these two studies underscores the need for additional data on the effects of inhaling nicotine-laced vapor on human health and e-cigarettes' efficacy as a cessation tool.

An editorial published in the June issue of Addiction calls for “an accurate and evidence-based debate” among researchers to help tease out the risks and potential benefits associated with this latest nicotine-delivery system.

“There is ongoing debate within the nicotine and tobacco research community concerning whether electronic cigarettes will offer a way out of the smoking epidemic or a way of perpetuating it,” the editorial states. “Robustly designed, implemented and accurately reported scientific evidence will be the best tool we have to help us predict and shape which of these realities transpires.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Do e-cigarettes help break the nicotine habit, or make it harder to quit?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2014/0520/Do-e-cigarettes-help-break-the-nicotine-habit-or-make-it-harder-to-quit
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe