Boston school bus drivers end wildcat strike, but city officials wary

After school bus service resumed Wednesday in Boston, drivers' representatives met with company officials to air grievances, including the use of electronic tracking devices on the buses.

Stephan Savoia/ AP Photo
Boston school buses sat idle behind a chain link fence at Veolia Transportation, the city's school bus contractor, Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2013. About 600 school bus drivers went on strike affecting most of the school district's 33,000 students.

Boston school buses were rolling again Wednesday morning – a day after a wildcat strike by drivers – but interruptions in school transportation remain a possibility as negotiations between the drivers' union and the city-contracted bus company continue, city officials warned

"We're still concerned about a similar action at any time, and we're keeping our contingency plans in place," said a Boston Public Schools spokesman, the Associated Press reported. 

Union leaders met Wednesday with officials from the Veolia bus company to discuss their grievances. The meeting was held on condition that drivers complete their normal rounds Wednesday morning and that union members who participated in Tuesday’s strike not be punished for their actions.

Topping a 16-point list of union demands presented to Veolia was a halt to the bus company's use of two new electronic tracking systems: a GPS device that allows parents to monitor bus location through an app on their smartphones, and Versatrans, a software program that helps route buses and is used by the company to determine evaluations and pay. 

Boston Mayor Thomas Menino called Wednesday’s meeting “very good news," but cautioned parents to have backup transportation plans, The Boston Globe reported. This was a change in tone from Tuesday, when Mayor Menino expressed his outrage at the strike and said he would use all available legal means to resume service and hold the strikers accountable.

Brian Ballou, the Boston schools spokesman, said officials heard rumblings about the strike Monday, and had placed monitors at bus yards Tuesday morning, the Globe reported. School officials heard about the strike shortly after 5 a.m. on Tuesday, and alerted parents shortly thereafter.

The school department said student attendance on Tuesday fell to 82 percent, about 10 percent lower than usual. The city enlisted the help of police officers to shuttle students to school, and children over the age of 11 were offered free rides on public transportation. 

Bus company representatives agreed Tuesday evening to meet with the drivers only after Federal District Court Judge George O’Toole refused to issue an injunction ordering them back to work. 

Union steward Jean Claude Toussaint said drivers staged the “work stoppage” to bring attention to a list of grievances. However, Patrick Bryan, an attorney for the United Steelworkers Local 8751, which represents the bus drivers’ interests, said union leadership did not authorize a strike. Rather, Mr. Bryan said, Tuesday’s action was organized by disparate union members. 

Veolia's attorneys were reluctant to accept that the union was unaware that hundreds of its members were going on strike. 

"This was beyond the actions of a few rogue members," Veolia attorney Paul Hodnett told the AP. 

Boston Public Schools awarded Veolia a five-year contract in March 2013 after a contract with First Student transportation company ended. In December 2011, First Student was fined $800,000 after 37 percent of its buses arrived as much as an hour late to school in the preceding months, the Globe reported. The school district did not say directly that bus tardiness was the reason it did not renew the contract with First Student. 

Tuesday's school bus strike was the first in Boston in more than 20 years, the Globe reported. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.