Bill Robles/ Reuters
A clean-shaven James Holmes appears in court in Centennial, Colo., in this Sept. 30 court sketch. Mr. Holmes is accused of killing 12 people and injuring 70 in a suburban Denver movie theater in on July 20, 2012.

Did James Holmes drop online hint about Aurora massacre?

James Holmes posted an online question – 'Will you visit me in prison?' – at some point before the Aurora, Colo., massacre. Hearings begin Monday to determine whether such evidence should be suppressed in his trial.

James Holmes, accused shooter in last summer’s Aurora, Colo., movie theater shooting, will return to court on Monday, as attorneys from both sides of the case argue what evidence jurors should be permitted to hear in the trial against Mr. Holmes.

The defense claims that nearly all of the prosecution’s key evidence – from the defendant’s iPhone to explosives seized in his apartment – is not permissible in the trial because it was obtained under illegal entry.

According to one motion to dismiss evidence, Holmes’s lawyers argue that proper legal procedure was not followed in searching Holmes’s apartment, or in the questioning of the defendant.

The prosecution counters that they needed to question Holmes about a bomb he was suspected of building in his apartment before the shooting. Though Holmes had asked for a lawyer after he was read his rights, police say that they needed to learn how to defuse the explosives in Holmes’s apartment.

Evidence collected from several online dating websites will also be discussed during motion hearings during the next several weeks.

Though Holmes left a very light online footprint, the defendant allegedly had accounts with the sites and AdultFriendFinder.

On his profiles, Holmes had written the question: “Will you visit me in prison?” Prosecutors hope to undermine the defense’s insanity plea with evidence from these sites, claiming that Holmes was aware of his actions. 

The judge has already rejected one defense attempt to suppress the website evidence, the Associated Press reported.

Earlier this month, prosecutors in Colorado were granted the right to see Holmes's mental health records, but not other medical records. None of the documents has been made public. 

News organizations have urged the judge to reject a request by Holmes's lawyer to limit public access to documents in the case, according to the Associated Press, which is one of petitioning organizations. The AP reports that the defense asked the judge to keep secret all transcripts from proceedings in open court, including all of the events and documents in the case. 

Holmes is charged with  killing 12 people and injuring 70 others during a midnight screening of “The Dark Knight Rises.” Reports suggested that he was wearing a gas mask, set off a tear gas bomb, and opened fire on the audience.

The defendant pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. 

On April 1, prosecutors announced they would seek the death penalty in Holmes’s trial. Colorado is one of 32 states with the death penalty.

The shooting, which took place on July 20, 2012, pushed Colorado legislators toward adopting new gun control measures. In a backlash, Colorado voters last month ousted two Democratic state senators who aggressively supported gun control. On Friday, recall organizers also won certification to launch a bid to oust state Sen. Evie Hudak (D) over gun control. If this bid succeeds, Republicans regain control of the state Senate. 

Holmes’s trial is scheduled to begin on Feb. 14, 2014.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Did James Holmes drop online hint about Aurora massacre?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today