UPS cargo plane crash: possibility probed of pilot error, debris in engine

Information from the flight-data and cockpit-voice recorders could be released Friday afternoon. The UPS cargo plane crash occurred Wednesday near a runway at the Birmingham, Ala., airport.

Hal Yeager/AP
A postal Inspector officer and a NTSB investigator are seen through a section debris of a UPS A300 cargo plane after it crashed on approach at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport Wednesday in Birmingham, Ala. The two pilots aboard the aircraft were killed.

Federal investigators hope to find clues from the flight-data and cockpit-voice recorders pulled from the debris of a UPS cargo plane, after it slammed into a grassy Alabama hillside, killing the pilot and first officer.

The National Transportation Safety Board has scheduled a press briefing for Friday at 5 p.m., Eastern time, and information about the recorders’ data is expected.

Officials are “cautiously optimistic” that the recorders from the Airbus A300 – retrieved from the crash site Thursday morning – would contain “good data.” The blackened and soot-covered boxes were sent to NTSB laboratories in Washington, D.C., and officials worked through the night to recover and download the information they contained.

With data from the recorders pending, federal investigators found no early indications that mechanical problems or a precrash engine fire caused the UPS cargo plane to go down about a half mile before the runway, an NTSB official said Thursday.

Some attention is being directed toward the possibility of pilot error. The NTSB has asked the United Parcel Service to provide the agency with crew-related documents, including training records, flight schedules, and other employment records. UPS identified the victims on Thursday evening as Capt. Cerea Beal of Matthews, N.C., and First Officer Shanda Fanning of Lynchburg, Tenn.

The NTSB is also analyzing the maintenance history of the Airbus A300, manufactured in France. In line with international treaties, the Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety, the French equivalent of the NTSB, is participating in the investigation as well.

There is evidence that the engines ingested debris, including dirt and branches from trees, NTSB member Robert Sumwalt said. Investigators are trying to determine why the plane was low enough to strike trees as it approached the runway of the Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport.  

The pilots did not send a distress signal before crashing near a north runway at the airport. The aircraft split in two upon impact.

A longer runway at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth had been closed as workers performed maintenance on the runway center-line lights. Investigators were looking into possible center-line runway light problems with the north runway, or other navigational aids associated with that runway, Mr. Sumwalt said.

Although there is no initial evidence of mechanical failure or engine fire, the UPS-owned Airbus A300 had six prior service difficulties, according to data from the Federal Aviation Administration. The most recent was in May 2012, when pilots declared an emergency after the air data computer failed during a flight.

Airbus said in a statement that it had delivered the aircraft to UPS in 2003. Since then it had flown about 6,800 flights, accumulating about 11,000 flight hours. The A300, Airbus's inaugural plane, began flying in 1972. The company manufactured a total of 816 of these planes, including the A310 model, up until 2007. The model was retired from US passenger service in 2009, according to the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.