Boy Scouts proposal to allow gay youths draws fire from both sides

The Boy Scouts drafted the proposal on gay youths after sending surveys to about 1 million members. Many respondents, the organization said Friday, felt that youths should not be denied the benefits of Scouting.

Tony Gutierrez/AP/File
James Oliver, left, hugs his brother and fellow Eagle Scout, Will Oliver, who is gay, as Will and other supporters carry four boxes filled with a petition to end the ban on gay scouts and leaders in front of the Boy Scouts of America headquarters in Dallas, Texas, in February.

The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) is proposing to lift its ban on gay youths, but not gay adults, the organization announced Friday, responding to pressure from gay rights advocates to drop restrictions in its membership policies.

The proposal, which will be put to a vote at its National Council meeting in May, is a change of course from the plan it floated earlier this year, which would have given local units the option to either include or exclude gay members. The new policy states that "no youth may be denied membership in the Boy Scouts of America on the basis of sexual orientation or preference alone," Deron Smith, the organization's spokesman, told Reuters.

The new position is already drawing criticism from groups on both sides of the issue. Gay rights advocates say the BSA should lift the ban for both youths and adults, while conservative groups and churches support keeping the ban in place.

"By refusing to consider an end to its ban on gay and lesbian parents, the Boy Scouts have missed an opportunity to exercise leadership and usher the organization back to relevancy," Rich Ferraro, a spokesman for GLAAD, which promotes lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights, told Reuters.

GLAAD, together with Scouts for Equality, supported campaigns that amassed 1.6 million signatures for an online petition on that calls for an end to banning gays from the Boy Scouts.

The Scouts are taking a "step in the right direction," said Rick Jacobs, founder of the Courage Campaign, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

"We are seeing a rapid and historic shift toward equality for all," Mr. Jacobs said in a statement. "The Boy Scouts are now beginning to catch up with this reality."

For John Stemberger, an Eagle Scout and founder of, a coalition of parents and Scouts who support the ban on gays, the proposal raises many concerns.

“This cleverly-worded resolution tries to dodge criticism from gay activists but still creates a myriad of problems for how to manage and ensure the safety and security of the boys in the program,” Mr. Stemberger said in a statement. “The current membership policy of Scouting, which is backed by more than 100 years of tradition, allows anyone to participate irrespective of sexual orientation, but only disallows the open and aggressive promotion of homosexuality and political agendas."

Leaders of the Mormon Church, which does not support same-sex relationships, will review the new proposal and its implications before taking a position on it, said Michael Purdy, spokesman for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, on Friday. There are more Mormon Boy Scouts nationally than any other religious denomination, the Associated Press reported, and 99 percent of the troops in the Great Salt Lake Council are sponsored by the Mormon Church.

In February, the BSA sent surveys to about 1 million members, receiving approximately 200,000 responses. Dozens of churches and religious organizations were included in the BSA survey because they sponsor a majority of Scout units. Many of the survey responses from religious institutions were concerned about allowing gay adult leaders but not about gay youth participants.

The Scouts executive committee drafted the proposal after it "embarked on the most comprehensive listening exercise in its history to consider the impact of potential changes to its membership standards policy on the organization," said a statement released Friday.

Overall, 61 percent of survey respondents supported the current policy of excluding gays, and 34 percent – including a majority of younger parents and teens – opposed the current policy.

"Scouting’s review confirmed that this issue remains among the most complex and challenging issues facing the BSA and society today," the statement said. "Even with the wide range of input, it is extremely difficult to accurately quantify the potential impact of maintaining or changing the current policy. While perspectives and opinions vary significantly, parents, adults in the Scouting community, and teens alike tend to agree that youth should not be denied the benefits of Scouting."

If the BSA allowed gay adults to be leaders, it could lose 100,000 to 350,000 members, the Associated Press said, citing BSA estimates. Thus, the BSA opted to include gay youths, but still exclude gay adults.

"The proposed resolution also reinforces that Scouting is a youth program, and any sexual conduct, whether heterosexual or homosexual, by youth of Scouting age is contrary to the virtues of Scouting," the statement said.

Material from the Associated Press contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to