#Deflategate: Did Patriots deflate footballs for Colts game?

The New England Patriots flattened the Indianapolis Colts 45-7 in their Super Bowl playoff game – but did they use deflated balls to do it?

Julio Cortez/AP
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (12) passes over Indianapolis Colts outside linebacker Erik Walden (93) during the first half of the NFL football AFC Championship game Sunday, Jan. 18, in Foxborough, Mass.

The New England Patriots may have knocked the wind out of the Indianapolis Colts in their 45-7 thrashing in Sunday night's AFC championship game – but did they also drain some air from the balls?

The NFL is investigating whether the Patriots cheated by using under-inflated footballs in the game that qualified the New England team for their sixth Super Bowl appearance, reported Bob Kravitz of local Indianapolis station WHTR:

The Patriots dominated the Colts throughout the game, and with or without deflated footballs, they almost certainly would have won. The Patriots will face the Seattle Seahawks in Super Bowl XLIX Feb. 1 in Phoenix.

But not without controversy.

While the result of the game is expected to stand, the Patriots could face a fine or lose future draft picks if an investigation finds they under-inflated footballs.

Deflated footballs are easier to throw, catch, and grip, especially in inclement weather, as was the case Sunday night in Foxborough, Mass., where heavy rain pummeled Gillette Stadium throughout the game.

According to the NFL rule book, footballs are required to be inflated with 12.5-13.5 pounds of air, and home teams must give all game balls to the league two hours and 15 minutes prior to kickoff to be inspected.

Patriots quarterback Tom Brady dismissed the charges as "ridiculous."

"I think I've heard it all," Mr. Brady told WEEI Radio Monday morning. "It's ridiculous.... That's the last of my worries. I don't even respond to stuff like this."

But it wouldn't be the first time the Patriots – a team with a reputation for on- and off-field shenanigans – have been accused of foul play.

In 2007, the team faced stiff penalties for illegally spying on opponents by videotaping their practices, a controversy that became known as "spygate."

After an investigation, the NFL found that Patriots had videotaped opponents between 2002 and 2007. As a result, the Patriots lost their 2008 first-round draft choice, coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000, and the team was fined $250,000. It was the largest financial sanction against a coach in NFL history, reported Sports Illustrated

"People like to pile on the Pats for their off-field, pre-game shenanigans and this won't be any different should the NFL find any inconsistencies with the way they handled their footballs against the Colts," CBSSports.com's Will Brinson reports.

With good reason, adds SI.

"Given their role in the Spygate scandal a few years back, the Pats are never going to get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to any allegations of subterfuge."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.