Bill Simmons suspended: brazen, profanity-laced rant forced ESPN's hand

ESPN commentator Bill Simmons called NFL commissioner Roger Goodell a liar and dared anyone to challenge his right to do so. ESPN couldn't ignore that, experts say.

Don Juan Moore/ESPN/AP/File
Bill Simmons contributes to ESPN's NBA Countdown show in this file photo. ESPN has suspended Mr. Simmons for three weeks after he repeatedly called NFL commissioner Roger Goodell a liar during a profane tirade on a podcast.

The National Football League's Ray Rice controversy has taken down yet another high-profile sports figure, but this time, from the wider circle of sports commentary.

Sports news behemoth ESPN suspended commentator Bill Simmons for three weeks on Wednesday for profanity-laced comments he made during his Monday podcast, both calling NFL commissioner Roger Goodell a liar and daring anyone to challenge his right to do so.

With commentators like Mr. Simmons flitting among social media, television, and podcasts, the rules of what is acceptable and what isn't are becoming less clear. The line between entertainer and journalist has been badly blurred.

But the nature of Mr. Simmons' rant essentially forced ESPN to take action, experts say. Not only could there have been legal implications, but ESPN would also have looked like a house in disorder if it had allowed Simmons to make an explosive and unsubstantiated claim so brazenly, they say.

The suspension is a reminder that, even in an emerging and unsettled new media landscape, there are lines, and they occasionally have to be drawn.

"It has become more difficult for journalists to understand when it is OK to be a fan and when one has to be a journalist," says Eric Zillmer, a sports psychologist and the athletic director at Drexel University in Philadelphia, via e-mail. But "ESPN wanted to separate themselves clearly from the meaningless chatter that is associated with sports talk radio."

Reaction to the video of former NFL player Ray Rice punching his fiancée in a casino elevator has been strong and mixed. Various news reports have provided evidence to suggest that Mr. Goodell either could have or should have seen the casino video.

But "a smoking gun is required to unequivocally corroborate Simmons' words," says Patrick Rishe, an expert on sports economics and an economics professor at Webster University in St Louis, in an e-mail. [Editor's note: The original version of this paragraph contained a different university affiliation for Professor Rishe.]

Simmons had no such evidence.

“When you start calling someone a liar without hard evidence to support the claim, this can lead to legal repercussions,” Rishe says. It also does not show much “journalistic integrity to flatly make claims without 100 percent proof.”

In a statement, ESPN noted that "every employee must be accountable to ESPN and those engaged in our editorial operations must also operate within ESPN's journalistic standards."

The suspension is a message both to the public and especially ESPN's workers that the company must draw a line, says Derek Arnold, a communication professor at Villanova University in Philadelphia. 

"It put ESPN in a spot where it might have looked like they would have lost control of one of [their] star columnists if [they] didn’t act quickly and decisively," he says.

As it is, some say it looks like ESPN caved to business pressures. ESPN has a lucrative contract with the NFL to broadcast Monday Night Football. While the network has covered the ongoing NFL scandal, “this action gives the PR perception that ESPN was influenced by NFL and took this action under pressure and fear of losing the contract,” says David Johnson, an Atlanta-based strategic consultant, in an e-mail.

For the NFL, it gives the impression, “fairly or unfairly that it used pressure to punish a critic,” he says.

But ESPN has its brand to think about, too, and Simmons was too much of a loose cannon, say others.

"It's another example that you can't say everything that comes to mind," says Ben Hordell, brand strategist and managing partner of DXagency. "It’s not just Bill’s opinion; it reflects on ESPN as a brand."

This is not the first time that line has been crossed, adds Drexel's Professor Zillmer. And "it will not be the last time. It is just that the line is moving and that is the unfortunate arbitrary ingredient in ESPN's decision."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.