NCAA tournament Thursday: Dayton vs. Stanford. Can Cinderella keep it up?

The 11th seeded Dayton Flyers meet the 10th seeded Stanford Cardinal Thursday night in the NCAA men's tournament's Sweet 16. Games are being broadcast on CBS and TBS.

Timothy T. Ludwig, USA TODAY Sports/REUTERS
Syracuse Orange guard Tyler Ennis (11) misses a shot as Dayton Flyers forward Devin Oliver (5) defends in the second half of a men's college basketball game during the third round of the 2014 NCAA Tournament at First Niagara Center, Mar. 22, 2014.

This NCAA men’s tournament has been a source both of exasperation and elation, so far. There are some perennial power conference contenders still standing, but also some upstarts who have laid waste to professional statisticians and hobbyist bracket-eers alike.

But for their loyal fans, double-digit seeds such as the the "Cinderella" Dayton Flyers, the 10th -seeded Stanford Cardinal and the 11th -seeded Tennessee Volunteers are the source of unexpected jubilation.

One of the most talked about matchups of this round features two upset specialists from the South Region - Stanford, who defeated New Mexico and Kansas, and 11th -seeded Dayton, who has felled, in succession, Division 1 powerhouses Ohio State and Syracuse. Stanford has proven itself less of an underdog than many might think - having defeated the University of Connecticut, Oregon and U.C.L.A. this season. But they have never met Dayton in a game before, and that’s where it gets interesting.

Stanford defeated Kansas by shutting down its premier shooting guard, Andrew Wiggins - holding him to four points and no three-pointers. This was largely a result of Stanford’s aggressive 2-3 zone defense, which effectively boxed out the Jayhawks’ big men on the inside, while baffling their outside shooters. Look for the Cardinal to rely on that again tonight.

Dayton’s hopes lie largely on their 11-man rotation that coach Archie Miller deploys in waves, not unlike a hockey team. Their defense is typically well-rested in addition to relentless. But the Flyers’ scoring also is balanced - with eleven different players who have achieved more than ten points per game this season.

Three of the Dayton players to watch closely are Devin Oliver, Jordan Sibert and Dyshawn Pierre―the Flyers’ best scorers. Shooting from the outside, they will have to contend with a big Stanford front court. The Cardinal, on the other hand, have four players who typically score in double-digits - led by guard Chasson Randle, who’s averaged over 18 points per game on the season.

Ordinarily, the Cardinal doesn’t turn the ball over a lot. But if Dayton’s defense is as persistent as it was against Syracuse, it could make life difficult for Stanford, who had their problems against Kansas’s full-court press.

Archie Miller, the young coach of the Flyers, comes from a winning tradition in his family - his older brother Sean is head coach of Pac-12 power Arizona. On the other bench, Stanford head coach Johnny Dawkins originally came to the Cardinal from an assistant coaching job at Duke and, after four losses in the team’s last seven games - on top of no March tournament appearance last year - he was rumored to be on the way out. But with Stanford’s resiliency this postseason, Dawkins’ fortunes have improved dramatically.

This game will go to the wire and come down to who controls tempo. If Stanford’s zone defense is as effective as it was last week, the Cardinal should take it. But if Dayton can keep its players fresh and hold Stanford big men Stefan Nastic, Josh Huestis and reserve power forward John Gage off the boards - while pestering Randle and the rest of Stanford’s back court, the Flyers should edge past.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.