Green, Neal spark Spurs past Heat in Game 3 of NBA Finals

A pair of San Antonio role players pushed the Spurs Tuesday night to a two games to one lead over Miami in the NBA Finals.

Mike Ehrmann/REUTERS
San Antonio Spurs' Kawhi Leonard (2) dunks against the Miami Heat during Game 3 of their NBA Finals basketball playoff in San Antonio, Texas June 11, 2013.

Danny Green came to the San Antonio Spurs out of North Carolina, a good, but not exactly great player.

The Spurs' Gary Neal was formerly a walk-on at Towson University in Maryland.

But in collaborating for 51 points last night, the tandem rained 13 three-balls on the reigning NBA champion Heat. That offensive deluge resulted in a 113-77 whitewashing of the Miami Heat at San Antonio's AT&T Center - the third most lopsided score in the history of the NBA Finals.

Interviewed after the game, Neal, who scored 6 threes and 24 points in 25 minutes of playing time, emphasized the word "attack." He said that even as teammates Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili were drawing tighter coverage, they were able to effectively kick the ball back to himself, Green and Kawhi Leonard, who were getting open looks at threes. And Neal seemed pleased with the additional playing time he's had in the past two games, which he noted had allowed him to get into a rhythm he wasn't able to achieve in previous playoff rounds.

Green, at a post-game press conference, likewise noted that even though San Antonio's offense was clicking on all cylinders, that was cause for the Spurs to redouble their emphasis on defense.

Enter the Spurs' Leonard, who was assigned the ordinarily daunting task of defending Miami's LeBron James during much of the Finals. But with his long arms and fly-paper coverage, the former San Diego State star held the Heat's marquee player to only 15 points on 7 of 21 shooting (1 of 5 from behind the arc). Leonard's defense has also forced James into taking longer and often poorer shots from the perimeter, which has proved a real problem for the Heat. To quote a frustrated James after the game, "Well, I've just got to play better."

The Spurs' Leonard and Tim Duncan also hit the glass hard, grabbing a combined 26 of the team's 52 rebounds (Miami had 36 on the night) and overwhelmed the Heat on the offensive glass, 19-9. The tandem also collaborated for 26 points of offense and each had a double-double for the game.  As a team, San Antonio forced 16 Heat turnovers, while reducing their own total to 12 (down from 16 in Game 2).

And on their way to outscoring the Heat by 30 points in the second half, the Spurs outpaced Miami in just about every statistical category: 20 fast break points to the Heat's 11; 40 points in the paint as opposed to Miami's 32, and 17 points off turnovers in contrast to Miami's 13.

For San Antonio, aside from having to anticipate Miami's adjustments for Game 4 on Thursday, they also are concerned as to whether Tony Parker, who had only 6 points in 27 minutes last night, can play through an apparent re-injury of his calf muscle.

But even were he to miss games as a result, teammates Neal and Green have demonstrated they are up to the challenge, and Spurs coach Gregg Popovich has apparently given them the "green" light in taking it on. According to Green, "I was trying to be active defensively. When I'm active defensively, it helps me stay in a rhythm offensively. And Pop [coach Gregg Popovich] does a great job of telling us to let it fly."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.