Baseball’s magical 90 feet and other great sports measurements and dimensions

10. Marathon racing's 26 miles, 385 yards

LUCA BRUNO/AP
Athletes run near Big Ben during the men's marathon at the 2012 Summer Olympics, at the 2012 Summer Olympics, London, Sunday, Aug. 12, 2012.

The official marathon distance works partly because it is such an oddity that it begs for attention. Instead of the distance conforming to some regular interval, it tacks on those mysterious 385 yards to add to the mystique.

Ancient history, as many people know, plays a role in the marathon’s length. It spins out of the legendary run of Pheidippedes, a Greek messenger, who supposedly ran from the battlefield in Marathon to Athens to announce the defeat of the Persians, only to collapse and die.  The story may be apocryphal but it’s a wonderful part of the race’s modern lore.

When the modern Olympics began in 1896 in Athens, the organizers wanted to make a connection to ancient Greece, so the marathon was created. It was 40 kilometers or roughly 25 miles long, the approximate distance Phheidippedes might have run. The marathon has remained part of the Olympics ever since, and uses the men’s race as the capstone on the final day of competition.  (The women’s marathon was added in 1984 in Los Angeles).

Marathon racing didn’t fix on 26 miles and 385 yards as the official distance until 1921, when the decision was made to use the distance of the 1908 London Olympic marathon. That unusual distance grew out of an effort to have the race from Windsor Castle to White City Stadium extended enough to finish in front of the Royal Box.

This historical background is an appealing factor, but so too is the feeling that the distance requires a heroic effort to complete. Much is often made of how runners hit “a wall” at about 20 miles, but push through to the finish line on grit and determination.

The magic of this distance has played a role in popularizing the marathon with the masses, who have found that with concerted training that it’s possible for recreational runners to complete the race – and participate in the same event with world-class athletes.

10 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.