NHL playoffs: Bruins, Rangers advance in very different Game 7 victories

The Boston Bruins and New York Rangers will continue the Stanley Cup quest after both teams won Monday night. One game featured a comeback for the ages, while the other was surprising for another reason.

Brian Snyder/REUTERS
Boston Bruins' Patrice Bergeron celebrates with teammate Zdeno Chara (l.) after scoring the overtime winner against the Toronto Maple Leafs in Game 7 of their NHL Eastern Conference quarter-final hockey playoff series in Boston, Massachusetts May 13, 2013.

The first round of the National Hockey League playoffs ended Monday night with a pair of wild games featuring two of the league 'Original 6' franchises moving into their conference's semifinal round.

The Boston Bruins, having lost two straight games to the Toronto Maple Leafs, found themselves trailing, 4-1, midway through the third and final period of Game 7 in Boston. Somehow, at that moment, the Bruins decided to put up a fight and found a way to score four straight goals in defeating the Maple Leafs, 5-4, in overtime.

Boston forward Nathan Horton's goal with 10:42 left in the game made it 4-2, Toronto. Then, linemate Milan Lucic popped home the rebound of a shot, closing the gap to 4-3 with 1:22 left in regulation. Finally, center Patrice Bergeron completed the historic comeback with just over 50 seconds remaining when his wrist shot beat Leafs goalie James Reimer, tying the score at four goals apiece.

Lucic, a Boston fan favorite due to his physical play on the ice, attributed the comeback to perseverance.

"It seemed like we started to play more reckless and taking pucks to the net and things like that. It was just like, (forget) it and leave everything on the line and hopefully everything will take care of itself," Lucic told NHL.com.

Bergeron capped off the magical night by collecting a loose puck in the Toronto end and sliding the puck past Reimer just over six minutes into the overtime period, giving the Bruins the series win, four games to three.

The Bruins will now meet the New York Rangers in the NHL's Eastern Conference semifinals. New York staged its own comeback in a quarterfinal series against the Washington Capitals, being down three games to two, by winning both Games 6 & 7 on consecutive nights.

Rangers goaltender Henrik Lundqvist was spectacular in both games, not allowing a single goal in either contest. Monday night, five different skaters scored for New York as they blanked Washington, 5-0.

Lundqvist credited the attention he pays to his craft, but noted how well his teammates have been playing in front of him, of late.

"As long as I'm focused on what I have to do, it is going to help me. But the way we've been playing, especially the last two or three games, as a goalie it is a great feeling. You feel the confidence from them, and hopefully they feel my confidence as well," the Rangers goalie said after the game.

The Rangers shut down a potent Capitals offensive attack, led by explosive winger Alex Ovechkin, who led the NHL with 32 goals in the regular season. Ovechkin did not score a single goal in the final five games of the series.

Beginning with Game 1 Thursday night in Boston, the Bruins and Rangers will meet in a playoff series for the first time in 40 years, according to the New York Times. The other Eastern Conference semifinal series features the Ottawa Senators and Pittsburgh Penguins, which begins Tuesday night in Pittsburgh.

The NHL's Western Conference semifinals have another pair of 'Original 6' teams, the Chicago Blackhawks and Detroit Red Wings, going against one another, beginning Wednesday night in Chicago. Finally, two California teams, the San Jose Sharks and the defending Stanley Cup champion Los Angeles Kings, will meet in the other Western semifinal, also starting Tuesday night.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.