Gauff beats the defending women's champion at Australian Open

Australian Open women's tennis championship serves up two surprises: 15-year-old Coco Gauff beats Japan's Naomi Osaka; Serena Williams is out.  

Lee Jin-man/AP
Coco Gauff of the U.S. celebrates after defeating Japan's Naomi Osaka in singles match during the opening week at the Australian Open tennis championship on Jan. 24, 2020.

Perhaps Serena Williams, now 38, will win a 24th Grand Slam title someday.

And maybe Coco Gauff, still just 15, never will earn her first major championship.

Sure felt, though, as if a generational shift was being signaled Friday at the Australian Open, with a pair of monumentally significant third-round results hours apart in the same stadium: a surprising first-week loss by Ms. Williams, then a historic victory by Ms. Gauff.

First, Ms. Williams faltered down the stretch for her earliest exit at Melbourne Park in 14 years, a 6-4, 6-7 (2), 7-5 loss to 27th-seeded Wang Qiang of China. It pushed Ms. Williams' gap between Slam trophies to three years.

"I'm way too old to play like this at this stage of my career," Ms. Williams said. "Definitely going to be training tomorrow, that's first and foremost – to make sure I don't do this again."

Ms. Gauff also was planning a practice session for Saturday, but hers was to prepare for a fourth-round match.

That's because the 67th-ranked Ms. Gauff took the latest step in her quick progression, becoming the youngest player in the professional era to eliminate the defending women's champion at the Australian Open, beating former No. 1 Naomi Osaka 6-3, 6-4. 

Only once the last point had been played did the preternaturally poised Ms. Gauff turn into a rather typical teen, joking about wanting to take "a selfie for Instagram" with Rod Laver, the 11-time major champion after whom the tournament's main stadium is named.

"Honestly, like, what is my life? Like, oh, my gosh!" Ms. Gauff told the crowd. "Two years ago, I lost first round in juniors and now I'm here. This is crazy."

It certainly is remarkable.

With a booming serve, a top-flight backhand and a winner's mentality, Ms. Gauff reversed the result from the first time she was across the net from Ms. Osaka, a former No. 1 who already owns two major titles at the age of 22.

When they played each other at the U.S. Open last September, Ms. Osaka won in two quick sets and then consoled Ms. Gauff, encouraging her to speak to the spectators who were pulling for her.

One reminder of just how young Ms. Gauff is: Most of the entrants in this year's junior Australian Open are older than she is.

Another: She is taking online classes and said she's been given permission to turn in homework late, "considering the circumstances."

Yet another: She doesn't have an official driver's license quite yet, stuck practicing behind the wheel with a learner's permit.

But put a tennis racket in her hands and move out of the way: Ms. Gauff is now 8-2 in her nascent Grand Slam career, with three of those wins coming against women who have multiple major titles. Her next match is against No. 14 Sofia Kenin, a 21-year-old American who beat Zhang Shuai of China 7-5, 7-6 (7).

Williams vs. Wang also was a rematch from Flushing Meadows last season – and the reverse result also happened for them. At the U.S. Open, Ms. Williams won 6-0, 6-1 in 44 minutes.

Ms. Wang credited that with prompting her to spend more time in the gym so she could add more oomph to her shots.

"I always believed I could do this one day," Ms. Wang said with a laugh. "I didn't know which day."

Like Ms. Wang, Ms. Gauff was much better on Friday than in New York. Ms. Gauff's improvement revealed itself in her serving – she put 15 of her initial 16 first serves in play – and her steadiness.

Ms. Gauff declared herself more calm for this matchup.

"That," she decided, "made the difference."

So did letting Ms. Osaka make the mistakes, 30 unforced errors in all, compared to 17 for Ms. Gauff.

With that, Ms. Gauff became the youngest player to beat a top-five opponent in a women's tour-level match since Jennifer Capriati did it at 15 in 1991.

"You don't want to lose to a 15-year-old, you know?" Ms. Osaka said.

So, Naomi, could you have done something differently?

"Put the ball in the court," came the reply.

Ms. Williams had similar issues, and even though she went from a massive deficit to even as can be, she could not do what was required in the late going.

Down to what sure felt like her last chance, Ms. Williams came through with a cross-court forehand winner to close a 24-stroke point, then raised her arms, held that celebratory pose, and looked over toward her guest box.

Finally, on her sixth try, after 1½ hours of action, she had managed to convert a break point against Ms. Wang. Soon enough, they were headed to a third set and it appeared that the comeback was on.

It turned out that Ms. Williams only was delaying a surprising defeat.

So tough at the toughest moments for so many years, Ms. Williams was the one who came undone, often displaying what she later called "the signature 'Serena frustration' look."

Since grabbing major championship No. 23 at the 2017 Australian Open, while she was pregnant, Ms. Williams hasn't added to her total.

She appeared in four major finals over the past two seasons, losing each one.

Ms. Williams owns seven trophies from the Australian Open and hadn't lost as early as the third round at either of the hard-court Grand Slam tournaments – in Melbourne or at the U.S. Open – since all the way back in 2006.

This was the first Grand Slam tournament in 11 years with each of the top 10 seeded women reaching the third round. Who would have suspected Ms. Williams would be the first to lose, followed soon thereafter by No. 3 Osaka?

Ms. Williams was only seeded No. 8, on account of how infrequently she has competed since being away from the tour while having a baby in September 2017.

She started 2020 well enough, winning a hard-court tuneup title in Auckland, New Zealand, this month for her first trophy of any sort in three years - and first as a mom.

But Ms. Williams wasn't able to carry that success to the Grand Slam level, where it matters the most to her.

She began her news conference by crediting Ms. Wang but eventually shifted to criticizing herself for not playing well enough to win.

"I didn't return like Serena. Honestly, if we were just honest with ourselves, I lost that match," Ms. Williams said. "I can't play like that. I literally can't do that again. It's unprofessional. It's not cool."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.