Kavanaugh hearing could hold lessons for staying power of mistakes

As sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh is raising questions about the long-lasting implications of teenage behavior, young people today raised amid social media reflect on the consequences of their actions. 

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's Supreme Court nominee, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Sept. 5.

The drama surrounding President Trump's pick for the Supreme Court over the nominee's behavior in the 1980s has reinforced a warning today's social media-savvy high school students have grown up hearing: What they say and do now will live well past graduation.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh faces a historic hearing Thursday over assault allegations dating back to his high school and college years. He has denied the allegations.

Some teenagers today say they are more mindful of the enduring quality of their words and actions because they've grown up with the internet, and social media posts are increasingly part of the college admission and job vetting process.

In contrast, the evidence collected in the Mr. Kavanaugh's past includes decades-old yearbooks and calendars.

California high school senior Maya Carpenter, 17, says she's taken classes since middle school on being safe on the internet, and her high school offers a digital citizenship class on the subject.

"They put a lot of emphasis on how whatever you say never really goes away," she said. "What's happening with the Kavanaugh hearings is a great example of that."

At least 10 prospective Harvard University students learned this lesson the hard way last year when their dream school rescinded admission offers after they traded posts on Facebook that were reportedly often sexually explicit and mocked Mexicans, the Holocaust, sexual assault, and child abuse.

Colleges also make no secret of the fact they visit applicants' social media profiles. A Kaplan Test Prep survey in April said 68 percent of colleges consider profiles on Facebook and Instagram "fair game" as they decide who gets admitted.

A big difference today – it's unlikely to take 30 years for misconduct to cause problems.

"It's definitely something that a lot of people are aware of," said Georgia VanDerwater, 18, of Holland, N.Y.

She is cautious about what she posts online, and even her mother keeps tabs on her social media posts and messages when she sees something that could be troublesome down the road.

"Be it a joke or a swear word in a tweet, I send it back. I will write and say, 'I just want you to know that when I read this I interpreted it this way, and so other people might interpret it this way,' " said Georgia's mother, Amy VanDerwater.

Kavanaugh is pushing back against allegations of sexual misconduct and excessive drinking in the early 1980s as he tries to convince senators he is worthy of a Supreme Court seat. His 1983 high-school yearbook refers to plenty of drinking while at Georgetown Preparatory School, the private all-boys school in Maryland, including being treasurer of the "Keg City Club" – "100 Kegs or Bust."

Bob Farrace, spokesman for the National Association of Secondary School Principals, says schools have been steering students toward more constructive yearbook posts for years.

"Principals and yearbook advisors have always dissuaded students from writing inappropriate commentary in their yearbook," he said, "understandably because such comments reflect badly on both the school and the student."

But it's not just bad acts that live on.

Ms. VanDerwater, a freshman at the State University of New York at Geneseo, knows that if a potential employer Googles her name, they'll see that she helped organize a high school walkout last year to demonstrate for stricter gun control, and that she called out a Republican congressman for not taking part in a forum on the topic.

As she got involved with gun protests, she had to weigh whether that political activity might work against her if she tries getting a job with an employer with different political views. In the end, she decided it was worth it because a company like that wasn't a good fit anyway.

"But it definitely could make a difference, because if you Google my name, that will come up," she said. "I've thought about that."

Sophomore James Connor at Northport High School in New York said students like him are being reminded by parents and teachers of how youthful indiscretion can come back to haunt them, "but we also do learn that a lot from just growing up and being online in the 21st century."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP journalist Jocelyn Gecker contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Kavanaugh hearing could hold lessons for staying power of mistakes
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today