Are national anthem protests hurting the NFL TV ratings?

NFL anthem protests: The NFL does not attribute the 11 percent ratings drop to the national anthem protests that started with Colin Kaepernick a month ago and have since swept the league.

Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP
San Francisco 49ers outside linebacker Eli Harold (58), quarterback Colin Kaepernick (7) and safety Eric Reid (35) kneel during the national anthem before an NFL football game against the Arizona Cardinals in Santa Clara, Calif., Oct. 6, 2016.

In the past four weeks, the NFL's TV ratings have dropped by 11 percent. While the timeline coincides with the start of San Franchisco 49ers’ quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s protest of the national anthem, the NFL attributes the decline to viewer interest in election coverage.

NFL executives Brian Rolapp and Howard Katz penned a letter to all 32 teams explaining the situation, in response to media inquiries about the decline in ratings, which prior to this season have been consistently high.

“While our partners, like us, would have liked to see higher ratings, they remain confident in the NFL and unconcerned about a long-term issue,” said the letter from Rolapp and Katz. They added that ratings have grown by 27 percent in the last 15 years and that football “continues to be far and away the most powerful programming on television and the best place for brands and advertisers.”

The NFL has attributed this season’s drop in rates primarily to the above-average interest in the election, because while Sunday game-time ratings for ESPN, CBS, and NBC have gone down, those for Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC have gone up. Election coverage drew ratings away from the NFL in 2000 as well, during coverage of the George Bush and Al Gore election.

Other factors contributing to the lower ratings include the early-season absence of several key players, increased online NFL offerings, and potentially over-saturation of the market, with games airing Sunday, Monday, and Thursday.

The NFL made it clear that they do not attribute the 11 percent ratings drop to the national anthem protests that started with Mr. Kaepernick a month ago and have since swept the league.

“In fact, our own data shows that the perception of the NFL and its players is actually up in 2016,” NFL executives wrote in the letter to the teams.

And sales of Kaepernick’s jersey reflect that.

Initially, the second-string quarterback's protest angered fans, leading some to burn his jersey in disgust. Now, the NFL is selling more of his jerseys than it did in the last eight months combined, making it the third-highest selling jersey in the league, behind Dallas Cowboys’ Ezekiel Elliott and the New York Giants’ Odell Beckham Jr.

Athletes across other sports are joining in the protest as well, and the trend is spreading to non-professional teams as well.

"I think it shows that the younger generations are about this and they did it together," Phoenix Mercury player Mistie Bass told the Associated Press. "They are understanding what is going on in our society. It's perfect because they are so caught up in their phones. To see them standing up for social injustices, and wanting things to be right in their communities, I think is awesome."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.