FDA bans e-cigarette sales to minors: Why now?

On Monday, the US federal regulator started a ban on sales of e-cigarettes to people under 18 and requires products on the market since 2007 to undergo federal review.

Reed Saxon/AP/File
Vials of flavored liquid at Vapeology LA, a store selling electronic cigarettes and related items, in Los Angeles in December 2013. The US Food and Drug Administration began banning sales of e-cigarettes to minors on Monday and requiring products on the market since 2007 to undergo federal review.

The US Food and Drug Administration began banning sales of electronic cigarettes to minors on Monday, apparently ending a contentious debate about whether e-cigarettes should be considered separately from other tobacco products.

In addition to barring the sale of e-cigarettes and other tobacco products to people under 18, the rules also require a photo ID to purchase them, stop retailers from handing out free samples, and require all e-cigarettes on the market since February 2007 to undergo a federal review.

The battery-operated devices, which vaporize a flavored fluid that typically includes nicotine, have often been marketed as a way for smokers to wean themselves from regular cigarettes. But with studies showing that e-cigarettes can lead young people to traditional tobacco products, the regulator is particularly aiming to crack down on the industry.

“We have more to do to help protect Americans from the dangers of tobacco and nicotine, especially our youth,” Sylvia Burwell, secretary of the US Department of Health & Human Services, in a statement released by the FDA in May. “As cigarette smoking among those under 18 has fallen, the use of other nicotine products, including e-cigarettes, has taken a drastic leap. All of this is creating a new generation of Americans who are at risk of addiction.”

One study by researchers at the University of Southern California found that teens who use e-cigarettes – often known as vaping – are six times more likely to try regular cigarettes than those whose have never vaped.

But some caution that the study, released in June, didn’t necessarily prove that vaping causes teens to begin smoking cigarettes, since the survey didn’t track how many times the teens had vaped before they tried cigarettes.

“What's probably happening is these kids did not become regular vapers, (and) they turned to smoking,” Michael Siegel, a professor at the Boston University School of Public Health and a proponent of e-cigarettes as a way to reduce combustible cigarette use, told Reuters.

The industry’s lobbying group makes a similar argument in favor of e-cigarettes, noting the health care costs for Americans who smoke cigarettes.

These new regulations create an enormously cost-prohibitive regulatory process for manufacturers to market their products to adult smokers and vapers,” harming a ”multi-billion job-creating industry,” the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association said in May.

The group also notes scientific evidence showing that e-cigarettes, which don't offer the tar and chemicals of burning tobacco, are "more than 95 percent less harmful than combustible cigarettes."

But proponents say e-cigarettes have a variety of harmful effects, including that e-cigarettes may flout clean air laws, Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, said during a media briefing in May, when the rules were announced, US News reports.

The rules aim to rein in the industry as regulators have found that marketing efforts, particularly directed at teens, have increased.

E-cigarette companies spent $115 million on advertising in 2014, compared to $6.4 million in 2011, the [Center for Disease Control’s] National Youth Tobacco Survey found. And they feature familiar images of sex, rebellion, and gritty independence that got yesterday's teens smoking regular cigarettes,” The Christian Science Monitor’s Lucy Schouten reported in January.

Under the FDA’s rules, companies won’t be allowed to promote vaping as a healthy alternative to smoking unless they provide strong scientific evidence to support that claim, Mr. Zeller said. The rules also apply to other tobacco products, including cigars, hookahs, and pipes.

The Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association estimated that the rules will mean that 99 percent of all e-cigarette products on the market will have to be submitted to the FDA’s review.

The regulator says existing brands will have at least three more years on the market before the regulations are enforced – two years while the companies prepare their applications and another year of FDA review, USNews reports.

But while the companies have condemned the rules, medical associations and health experts say they are needed to avoid putting young people on the road to smoking.

The use of e-cigarettes in kids appears increasingly likely to result in an increased risk of using regular cigarettes, CDC Director Tom Frieden said at a press briefing in January. “They are not harmless.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to FDA bans e-cigarette sales to minors: Why now?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today