Why synthetic drug busts are so rare

Houston officials charged 16 men with drug-related charges after millions of dollars and almost 10 tons of synthetic drugs were found during a bust. Despite the reach of synthetic drugs, regulating their use is difficult. 

John Badman/The Telegraph/AP/File
Macoupin County Board Chairman Andy Manar shows reporters examples of synthetic drugs at a 2012 news conference in Carlinville, Ill. Federal and Texas authorities charged 16 people in conjunction with a synthetic drug ring on Tuesday.

Reminiscent of the hit AMC show "Breaking Bad," a professor in the Southwest has been charged with possession and intent to distribute synthetic drugs.

The Houston Police Department, in collaboration with the US Drug Enforcement Administration, have arrested 12 people in the Houston area, one suspect in Virginia, and another suspect in California. Authorities are still searching for two other Texas residents involved – Ziad Mahmoud Alsalameh and Aqil Khader – who are considered fugitives. One of the men arrested, Omar Al Nasser, is a finance professor with the University of Houston in Victoria, Texas.

"These individuals are being charged in the manufacturing of what has become one of the most dangerous and emerging public health threats in the United States – synthetic drugs," Kenneth Magidson, the US Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, tells ABC13 News in Houston. 

Synthetic drugs are compounds comprised of man-made chemicals and sometimes added to natural plant material that act as a chemical version of popular illegal drugs, such as marijuana or cocaine. Controlling their distribution has been particularly challenging for law enforcement because they are often disguised as legal products, such as bath salts or potpourri, and sold in plain sight in gas stations and convenient stores.

Authorities are asking for a return of $35 million in a money judgment. Judging by the millions of dollars found on scene at the bust – along with nine and a half tons of synthetic drugs – Mr. Magidson says this return shows "the kind of money" authorities believe these 16 men were making through their drug ring. 

"Some of the products were allegedly labeled as 'potpourri' or 'incense,' with some including false information such as '100% legal,' 'lab certified,' or 'not for human consumption,' " says the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas in a press release Tuesday. "According to the charges, these products were, in fact, dangerous drugs." 

Regardless of their accessibility, synthetic drugs are classified as Schedule I drugs – the DEA's listing of the most dangerous and addictive drugs, including LSD, heroin, and ecstasy. 

Synthetic drugs, specifically synthetic marijuana, have come to the forefront of national and local agendas after especially high uses were recorded among high school students. According to a University of Michigan study from 2012, 11.3 percent of high school seniors recorded using synthetic marijuana, the second most-used drug after marijuana at 36.4 percent.

Initially, states tried to ban these drugs individually, but distributors would simply make minor changes to the chemical composition of the product, making them technically legal. To combat this, legislation has issued more general bans to prohibit synthetic drugs at large.

"Since 2011 all 50 states have banned two types of the synthetic drugs – cannabinoids (a.k.a. 'synthetic marijuana,' 'Spice,' or 'K2') and cathinones (a.k.a. 'bath salts') – with the majority doing so via legislation," according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Dealers and distributors have also tried to mask their products with various names, however the drugs are illegal regardless of title.

"Companies selling synthetic drugs as legal products, like incense or bath salts, attempt to avoid liability for harm from use of the products as drugs by labeling the products as not intended for human consumption. These labels have no impact on the applicability of local, state or federal laws that limit or prohibit the sale of synthetic drugs," explains the American Public Health Association. "Just like cocaine may not be sold as a kitchen cleaner, banned synthetic drugs may not be sold as incense."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.