Why L.A. wants to spend $100 million on the homeless

The Los Angeles homeless population has increased more than 10 percent over the past two years. 

(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)
Tents used by the homeless line a downtown Los Angeles street with the skyline behind Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2015. Los Angeles officials say they will declare a state of emergency on homelessness and propose spending $100 million to reduce the number of people living on city streets. City Council President Herb Wesson, members of the council's Homelessness and Poverty Committee and Mayor Eric Garcetti announced the plan Tuesday outside City Hall, as homeless people dozed nearby on a lawn.

Over the past two years, homelessness in Los Angeles has increased by more than 10 percent and city officials have announced a $100 million plan to help inhabitants.

According to the Los Angeles Almanac, “an estimated 254,000 men, women and children experience homelessness in Los Angeles County during some part of the year and approximately 82,000 people are homeless on any given night.”

Thousands of these people live out of tents, makeshift cardboard shelters or just on the street itself on the city’s notorious Skid Row.

On Tuesday, Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti announced that city officials are planning to declare a state of emergency on homelessness and spend $100 million to eradicate it, reported the Associated Press. But the emergency declaration and the funding will require action by the full City Council.

"These are our fellow Angelinos," Mr. Garcetti said. "They are those who have no other place to go, and they are literally here where we work, a symbol of our city's intense crisis."

The council members hope to have a strategic plan drafted by December so that the first rollout of funds can happen in January. These funds will likely go towards permanent housing and shelter.

To address immediate needs, Garcetti announced a “critical short-term strategy to secure an additional $13 million in emergency funding to expand homeless services and housing,” the majority of which will specifically assist “veterans and non-chronically homeless people in the form of housing subsidies,” according to a press release from the mayor’s office.

The city’s gentrification, rising rent and home prices and the long recession have all contributed to the rise in homeless say experts. Aging hotels and abandoned buildings on Skid Row have been converted into expensive lofts and upscale restaurants, pushing the homeless to spread out all across the city, even into wealthy areas such as Brentwood and the San Fernando Valley as shown by a map the Los Angeles Times compiled in June.

But even $100 million may not be enough, say some. “A hundred million dollars won't even buy all the homeless pillows," Alice Callaghan, long-time advocate for the homeless on Skid Row, said. "A hundred million certainly won't build much housing – and what we really have here is a housing crisis."

And city officials may have an ulterior motive, to “reduce the visibility” of the homeless in preparation for a potential Olympic hosting in 2024 suggests Ms. Callaghan.

"They can spend billions on getting the Olympics," she said of the proposal that anticipates spending $6 billion in public and private financing to bring the Games to LA. "But not on getting people off the sidewalks."

However, a report done earlier this year by the city's top budget official found Los Angeles already spends $100 million a year to deal with homelessness – much of it on arrests and other police services. If the mayor’s additional stimulus can be used to build housing, several homeless could find themselves in a more stable living environment next year.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.