Is 'pretending' to be Muslim an appropriate history assignment?

A Wisconsin high school teacher faces criticism for assigning a paper to her sophomore world history class in which the students were instructed to write from a Muslim perspective. 

Mark Lennihan/AP/File
Students at Queens College in New York gather for a vigil, Feb. 18, in honor of three Muslim students killed recently near the University of North Carolina. Wisconsin history teacher Beth Urban, has come under fire for having her students write an essay where they took the perspective of an American Muslim.

Can assignments encouraging students to assume a new identity cultivate understanding and empathy? 

That was the goal one tenth grade history teacher had in mind when she assigned her world history class a five-paragraph point-of-view essay instructing students to write from the perspective of a male or female Muslim, identifying issues that Muslims in America face.

According to an email Ms. Urban sent, students were supposed to draw their information from a handful of documentaries the class watched.

Ms. Urban's essay backfired when a parent forwarded the email assignment to local conservative talk radio host Vicki McKenna, who posted a screen shot of the email on Twitter. The conservative blogosphere took exception to the writing exercise, claiming history class was not the place to show preference to one religion over another.

Co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck said on Fox and Friends, "Well some people were concerned, 'Hey, did you do this for other religions, and what does this have to do in the role of a history class?'"

Some confusion was due to the wording of the email, with some in the media criticizing the phrasing, "pretend" to be Muslim. According to Union Grove superintendent Al Mollerskov, the email using the word "pretend" was only sent to one student who was absent from school, and was not used in the original, in-class writing prompt. Mr. Mollerskov says the parent who forwarded the email to the media never contacted school administrators to voice their concern.

Mollerskov also told the Monitor that students worked on similar assignments for other religions earlier this year. He stood by the assignment as an opportunity for students to gain perspective. Ms. Urban was unavailable for comment. 

"She wanted students to learn something from the assignment, not become Muslims," Mr. Mollerskov says. "She did a similar assignment on Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity, and Buddhism and we received zero phone calls."

Polls show some Americans do want to learn more about Muslims and the faith of Islam. An Arab American Institute poll found 52 percent of respondents said they needed to learn more about Muslims before evaluating their attitudes toward them. Overall, the poll found American attitudes toward Muslims have been growing more negative – only 27 percent of those polled in 2014 had a favorable view of Muslims –  down from 35 percent who had a favorable view of them in 2010. 

A 2014 study from Pew Research found that only 38 percent of those surveyed personally know someone who is Muslim.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.