Ferguson election: Model for other troubled communities?

A relatively large voter turnout Tuesday added two more black members to the city council in Ferguson, Mo. This could be a step toward racial healing in the town.

|
Robert Cohen/The St. Louis Post-Dispatch/AP
Renald Smith, right, thanks Bob Hudgins, Ferguson City Council candidate, as he returns home after getting a ride to the polls in Ferguson, Mo., Tuesday, April 7, 2015.

After the fire of violence and protest, the cooling effects of the ballot box and representative democracy have begun to appear in Ferguson, Mo.

In municipal elections Tuesday, voters in Ferguson – where white police officer Darren Wilson shot and killed black teenager Michael Brown last August – added two black members to the city council, bringing the total to 3-3 in racial terms.

While voter turnout wasn’t spectacular (about 30 percent), it more than doubled last year’s voting percentage on a day when harsh weather might have kept many at home. More important, the new council is taking a roll-up-our-sleeves approach to governing a community where much healing work remains to be done – a model, perhaps, for other communities dealing with racial stress and protest.

One of the new black council members in Ferguson is Wesley Bell, a lawyer and criminal justice professor who also is a part-time municipal judge in a neighboring jurisdiction.

“This community came out in record numbers to make sure our voices were heard,” he told reporters. “When you have a community engaged, the sky is the limit.”

Marty Einig, who participated in Ferguson protests following last year's shooting, sees “raw material within this community to demonstrate hope.”

"I see a glass that's half full, and I feel that the people have the will to force change,” Ms. Einig told the Associated Press.
 
Charrolynn Washington agrees that the election is where real change will occur.
 
"As much change is needed here in Ferguson, this is where we begin – not out there in the streets, doing what they were doing – but right here," Ms. Washington said, according to AP. "They need to be voting and putting people in position to make the change and make the decisions that need to be made."

“From what I've seen today, the community became empowered and came out. That is a win,” tweeted Patricia Bynes, Democratic committeewoman of Ferguson Township in St. Louis County, who is African-American.

If Ferguson can pull itself up from distrust and despair, as such comments indicate is now possible, then it could serve as a model for other communities where recent racial issues – including police violence – still trouble America 50 years after the landmark Voting Rights Act was passed.

It’s often been an uphill fight, but ensuring free, fair, and representative elections has brought improvement elsewhere. It took years for Boston – whose history includes federally mandated school desegregation in the 1970s – to progress from a city council elected at large (which typically meant all-white) to one that includes district representation and a more racially diverse membership.

Such change can be incremental. New York Mayor Bill de Blasio’s efforts to reform that city’s controversial stop-and-frisk police tactic have met with political resistance, not only from NYPD union members but also from many white New Yorkers.

"It's a tale of two cities,” Maurice Carroll, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll, said in releasing a poll last November. “Black voters think the mayor is terrific. White voters don't approve. And the racial gap gets wider every time we ask."

The racial gap couldn’t have been wider in Ferguson, where blacks make up two-thirds of the population but the mayor, other city officers, and – until now, at least – five of the six city council members are white.

After the police killing of Mr. Brown and the protests that followed, the city manager, police chief, and municipal judge were forced to resign, and the municipal court clerk was fired for racist e-mails. In a review of policies and practices in Ferguson, the US Justice Department found racial bias and profiling in the police department and a profit-driven municipal court system. 

“Change is coming to Ferguson,” writes Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, in a CNN op-ed column Wednesday. “But the scope and breadth of that change will depend upon the ambition and discipline of activists and residents, whose passion and tenacity have already transformed the trajectory of leadership in a typical American town.”

Still needed in Ferguson (and elsewhere among US municipalities), Ms. Ifill says: reforming those governing systems that typically pair a strong city manager with a weak mayor and city council, and holding local elections with state and federal elections to encourage better turnout.

“It's not that Ferguson is so different than towns across America,” she writes. “It's precisely because Ferguson holds up a mirror to flaws in our democratic system of government in towns across this country that the stakes are so high.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Ferguson election: Model for other troubled communities?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2015/0408/Ferguson-election-Model-for-other-troubled-communities
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe