Random acts of Pasta? How some cities prohibit feeding the needy.

A Utah man gave Olive Garden meals to area homeless people. But recent restrictions on cities' distribution of food to the homeless may mean that these acts will become more sparse. 

Steve Helber/AP Photo/File
In this May 22, 2014 photo, patrons exit an Olive Garden Restaurant, a Darden restaurant brand, in Short Pump, Va.

When Italian restaurant chain Olive Garden sold 1,000 unlimited pasta passes — unlimited meals over seven weeks — Matt Tribe, of Ogden, Utah, jumped on the offer, aiming to use the card 100 times. He distributed 10 of the 100 meals to area homeless people.

But the fall project, dubbed “Random Acts of Pasta” by Mr. Tribe, comes as many cities are tightening their restrictions on feeding the homeless.

An October report from the National Coalition for the Homeless found that more than 30 US cities have restricted or are trying to restrict the sharing of food with the homeless.

One of those cities is Salt Lake City, Utah, which is about 40 miles away from Ogden. There, a food handler’s permit is necessary to prepare and serve food, though a bill that awaits Senate action would allow volunteers to have food safety training, not a permit. 

In a video that Mr. Tribe released, he handed paper bags of fettuccini Alfredo to homeless individuals.

“You guys hungry?” he asks. “How about some Olive Garden? That sound alright?”

According to the report, 62 percent of bans enacted in 2013-14 involved restrictions on serving food on public property. 

“Local law enforcement agencies argue that groups that share food with people experiencing homelessness often block traffic or leave behind garbage,” the report reads.

But the coalition says that in some cities, meeting difficult location standards means that organizations may have to distribute meals in remote areas or may face fines if a permit is rejected.

When a 90-year-old Fort Lauderdale, Florida, man received a citation for feeding the homeless publicly, the effects of the area restrictions became clear.

The Fort Lauderdale restrictions block organizations from feeding the homeless outside within 500 feet of one another and say operations must be 500 feet from residential properties.

The man, Arnold Abbott, had been feeding the homeless locally for more than two decades. But the city had passed laws that restricted where organizations could give food in late October.

Proponents of these restrictions, like Fort Lauderdale mayor Jack Seiler, said that distributing food to the homeless perpetuates a “cycle of homeless” in the city. “Providing them with a meal and keeping them in that cycle on the street is not productive,” he told the Sun Sentinel in late October.

The National Coalition for the Homeless report says that lack of affordable housing, mental health, and physical disability present far deeper problems than do food-sharing programs.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Random acts of Pasta? How some cities prohibit feeding the needy.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today