The Beatles: 50 years after 'Ed Sullivan,' they're everywhere, in everything

Fifty years after their iconic performance on 'The Ed Sullivan Show,' the legacy of the Beatles lives on in iPods, music classes, and throughout pop music.

|
AP Photo, File
Paul McCartney, right, shows his guitar to host Ed Sullivan before the Beatles' live television appearance on "The Ed Sullivan Show," America's must-see weekly variety show, in New York, Feb. 9, 1964.

“I had never screamed for music before,” says songwriter Bonnie Hayes, sounding still slightly shocked at her own behavior.

She was in the third grade the first time she saw The Beatles. Like 73 million Americans, she and her father were watching "The Ed Sullivan Show" when the mop-top crew of rockers in suits belted out “All My Loving” to hundreds of shrieking teen girls.

“It was like nothing we’d ever seen before,” Ms. Hayes says. “There was something about that long hair with those shaking heads that just brought this scream from somewhere deep inside me.”

That was Feb. 9, 1964. The Fab Four had already earned a place on the music charts in Britain, but many in America had never heard anything like the Beatles. Rock 'n' roll had seemingly come and gone with the death of Buddy Holly in a plane crash in 1959 and Elvis's transition from stage performer to actor in 1961. With that iconic performance, "those four screaming, strumming, young Liverpudlians ... known as the Beatles" swept much of the nation off its feet, John Hughes reported in a front page story in The Monitor two days later.

Fifty years later, the Beatles' influence lives on in nearly every song on today’s popular music charts.

Solo crooner Bruno Mars, boy band One Direction, indie rock band Cornershop, and power pop band Fountains of Wayne all have echoes of the Beatles in their current work, says Rachel Rubin, a professor of American popular culture at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. Even hip hop owes a nod to the Beatles, who were the first musicians to use recorded samples of nonmusical sounds in their recordings.

The Beatles created their own “musical vocabulary,” that has become so much a part of music today that “any melody-driven pop group act will have been indirectly influenced, if not directly,” Professor Rubin says.

Over the years, bands like The Beach Boys and The Who modeled themselves after the Beatles. The Rolling Stones created the entire album "Let it Bleed" in response to the Beatles’ "Let it Be." Countless more musicians, including Joe Cocker, Ray Charles, Frank Sinatra, and David Bowie have covered Beatles songs.

“The Beatles were one of the most profound influences on songwriting – ever,” says Bonnie Hayes, professor and chair of the Songwriting Department at Berklee College of Music in Boston.

Professor Hayes has written songs for Bonnie Raitt, Bette Midler, Adam Ant, Cher, and Robert Cray, and credits much of her success to The Beatles.

“I took their songs apart with a microscope and tweezers and learned how they did it,” she says.

Today she urges her students at Berklee to do the same, pointing out the skill with which the band was able to weave together John Lennon’s “shuffley version of bluesy folk,” with Paul McCartney’s “American songbook style harmony.”

Just the fact that they wrote all of their own songs was groundbreaking for the time, but their ability to weave together a range of musical influences that spanned the globe was genre-shattering.

What’s more, they continued to break musical boundaries throughout their more than seven-year-long recording career.

“That was one of the weird things about the Beatles,” says Hayes. “Usually when bands hit a formula that worked they rode it till the end. Not the Beatles.”

Even more remarkably, they did it all with little to no classical training, says Stephen Schultz, a Carnegie Mellon music history professor who teaches a course on the music of the Beatles.

None of them could read or write music. McCartney had learned to play the piano as a boy, but beyond that, their musical acumen came from a genuine love of music and an uncanny ability to learn by ear, Professor Schulz says.

“They listened to a lot of music,” Schultz says. “Paul McCartney listened to a lot of classical music and brought that influence, John Lennon listened to a lot of rock 'n' roll, and George Harrison listened to a lot of Indian music and brought that influence.”

If they heard a new chord that they didn’t know how to play, they would take a bus across town, buy another guitarist a beer, and ask him to teach them to play it, says Chad Martin, an assistant professor of history and political science at the University of Indianapolis.

Perhaps it was that lack of formal training that made it possible for them to see over the typical genre boundaries. They managed to incorporate the sitar, musical scales borrowed from medieval church music, and “extramusical” sounds, such as seagulls or wine glasses all under the umbrella of pop music.

Until the Beatles came along, pop music was considered disposable, Professor Martin says.

“Pop was the music that people listened to as teenagers then dropped when they grew up, settled down, and developed taste,” Martin says. “The Beatles changed all that.”

While the most prominent Beatles fans at the time were the gaggles of shrieking, fainting teenyboppers, the band quickly earned recognition as serious musicians from many prominent musicians at the time, including renowned composer Leonard Bernstein.

Today, they are considered one of the greatest bands of all time, if not the greatest.

“You literally could teach a whole class, teaching everything that we teach at Berklee using just Beatles songs,” says Hayes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The Beatles: 50 years after 'Ed Sullivan,' they're everywhere, in everything
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2014/0209/The-Beatles-50-years-after-Ed-Sullivan-they-re-everywhere-in-everything
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe