Brian Griffin returns to 'Family Guy.' Was there ever any doubt?

Brian Griffin, the popular martini-drinking pooch that 'Family Guy' famously killed off three weeks ago, has been written back in to the show. Attention grabbed. Mission accomplished.

Fox
The Griffins (l.-r.): Meg, Peter, Lois, Stewie, Brian, and Chris, on the FOX animated comedy 'Family Guy.'

Brian Griffin is back.

Was there really any doubt? The FOX animated comedy “Family Guy” resurrected the popular walking, talking, martini-drinking pooch Sunday, following a three-week absence.

“You didn't really think we'd kill off Brian, did you?” tweeted “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane Sunday. Earlier, he posted, “And thus endeth our warm, fuzzy holiday lesson: Never take those you love for granted, for they can be gone in a flash.”

When a car struck and killed Brian in an episode airing Nov. 24, fans took to social media to howl in protest; online petitions also circulated, the combination of which provided “Family Guy” millions of dollars in free media attention.

Brian returned through the help of Stewie, his conniving infant friend, who … well, it had something to do with a time machine.

Rob Salkowitz, a comics expert and author of “Comic-Con and the Business of Pop Culture” (McGraw-Hill), says killing off characters, even if they resurface later, is “a sure-fire attention-getter.”

“The death of a character, especially a character that has people sentimentally attached, is shocking, it triggers an emotional response,” Mr. Salkowitz says. Killing off a character is valuable for any creative property, especially one that “is in a creative rut” and “needs something to refocus attention.”

Nearly every superhero has been killed and brought back to life, starting in 1994 when DC Comics announced it was killing Superman. That sent sales of the title through the roof and people into stores that had drifted from comics for years. The success of that maneuver summoned boardroom executions of many other iconic comic book characters.

Fans may not understand why a comic book or a television franchise would decide to kill off a popular character out of nowhere, but Salkowitz says the decision is never a creative one, but is more about the franchise owner reinvesting in their property to keep it relevant.

Killing off a character permanently wouldn’t make sense because millions of dollars would vanish, and the copyright on those characters would eventually become lost.

“They have to manage it like a portfolio. They can’t sell off the core value for a one-time gain,” he says.

One “Family Guy” character is assured to never return: Vinny, the new dog that replaced Brian for those three episodes voiced by “Sopranos” actor Tony Sirico. Brian’s return to the Griffin home, forced the family and Vinny to permanently part ways.

At one point, Vinny tried to cheer Stewie up by dressing up as Brian, but it didn’t work. The same was apparently true for the show’s fans.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.