N.Y. newspaper's map of local gun owners: A cheat sheet for burglars?

Gun owners whose names and addresses were published on a 'gun map' in a New York newspaper are angry. But a county official suggests that the map shows burglars which homes to avoid.

Did the Lower Hudson (N.Y.) Journal News, which recently published a "gun map" showing the names and addresses of registered gun owners, ultimately provide a service for criminals by showing which non-gun-owning homes may be safer to burglarize?

Up until now, gun owners have been the ones protesting the decision last month by the Gannett-owned newspaper, saying it put "in harm's way tens of thousands of lawful license holders," according to the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association.

But a "dumbfounded" Robert Astorino, the top elected official in Westchester County, N.Y., told The Washington Post Wednesday that "the newspaper did all the work" for criminals throughout the lower Hudson Valley area of New York who "are still deciding which house they're going to hit."

Since its publication on Dec. 22 – a week after the shooting of 20 grade-school children and six school staff in Newtown, Conn. – the gun map had fueled debate about journalistic ethics and media advocacy. But Mr. Astorino's comments have raised another contentious issue in the national gun-rights conversation: To what extent does gun ownership deter criminal activity?

Information about gun owners is a central point of disagreement in discussion about the Second Amendment. The federal government does not keep any inventory on who owns guns and for what reasons. It's left to states and counties to register and record people who sign up for concealed carry permits. The only published federal record about gun ownership is the number of background checks the federal government carries out.

Groups like the National Rifle Association have fought against a national gun registry, saying it would invite more gun-control scrutiny without providing any real benefit to public safety. But the local data is public, and the Journal News claims its gun map serves a legitimate purpose.

"I would love to know if someone next to me had guns … so I can deal with that," one Lower Hudson local, John Thompson, told the paper.

Yet critics question the Journal News's motives. Does knowing which neighbors are legally registered gun-carriers make a town safer, or is the map intended to demonize legal gun owners?

Neighboring Putnam County, for one, has so far refused to hand over its gun data despite a Freedom of Information Act request from the Journal News.

Meanwhile, bloggers have published addresses of Journal News employees, and the newspaper has hired armed guards in the wake of perceived threats sent by e-mail. Police have said the e-mails did not contain actionable threats.

The broader question of whether gun ownership deters crime yields vastly divergent – and often contradictory – findings, which activists on both sides have attempted to spin in their favor.

Fact-checking organizations note that the number of concealed-carry permit holders have soared during the past decade and that as many as 53 million US homes contain a gun. Yet violence has declined.

"Firearm murders are down, as is overall gun violence –  even as gun ownership increases," concludes Factcheck.org, which is run by the nonpartisan Annenberg Public Policy Center.

But other research suggests that gun ownership might be linked with crime trends in various ways. 

It's "probably true that rising crime leads to a perception of increased threat and, therefore, an increase in the prevalence of gun ownership," Garen Wintemute, director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California-Davis, told Factcheck.org. It's "also the case that making firearms more available is followed by an increase in firearm crime."

But does the Journal News map put non-gun owners in danger? There is evidence that some criminals are deterred by the possibility of their target being armed.

Forty percent of convicts had at some point decided against a crime because they worried that their victims were packing a gun, according to research by James Wright, a sociologist at the University of Central Florida. "One of the conclusions … was that bad guys do worry about armed potential victims, and to the extent possible try to avoid them," says Mr. Wright, author of "Armed and Considered Dangerous: A Survey of Felons and Their Firearms."

But it is hard to determine whether criminals might go so far as to use the Journal News map, suggests Wright.

"The fact of the matter is most bad guys are criminal opportunists, and they're likely not going to take a map with them when they try to decide, 'Gee, should we burglarize this house because maybe it's the one without a gun?' " he says. "We know full well that [burglars] break into houses because there doesn't seem to be anybody home, but part of that calculation is also, 'There's nobody in there with a 12-gauge [shotgun] ready to cut down on me.' "

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.