Union boss Trumka gets feisty when (sort of) defending Trump on trade

The AFL-CIO president mixed it up with reporters at a Monitor Breakfast that focused on President Trump’s efforts to rewrite US trade relationships.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor

Richard Trumka points to his 50-year AFL-CIO pin with pride.

“I got this two months ago,” the burly labor leader says, settling in for a Monitor Breakfast with 25 reporters on August 1.

It was in 1968 that Mr. Trumka, still a teenager, followed his father, uncles, and grandfather into the coal mines of southwestern Pennsylvania. Now, he’s in his third term as president of the nation’s largest federation of unions, his signature mustache mostly gray but his spirit undiminished.

Trumka is a familiar face at Monitor Breakfasts. He’s come every year since 2009, usually right before Labor Day. This year, we convened a bit early. But there was no shortage of union matters to discuss - especially with President Trump upending US trade relationships and the midterm elections coming.

Here’s where it gets tricky for Trumka: The AFL-CIO president is largely unhappy with Trump - and came wielding a list of about 50 “anti-worker actions” by the president. But he agrees with Trump’s stated goal of fixing trade practices and sticking up for American workers. Trumka has to tread carefully. The president won a lot of union members’ votes in 2016.

As I wrote in my story afterward, Trumka thinks all the talk of trade wars is “hysteria.” But even as he applauds Trump’s goal, he criticizes the president for using tariffs too broadly.

The two presidents talk, but their relationship is contentious - no surprise there. At the breakfast, Trumka clearly relished mixing it up with reporters. He and Dan Merica of CNN went at it over agricultural tariffs. And when another reporter tried to nudge a long-winded Trumka toward an answer on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Trumka responded impatiently. The labor chief later apologized for being “a bit contentious.”

Trumka also had a funny/tense exchange with Reuters reporter Ginger Gibson that involved Trumka’s dog - and the cost of dog food. That happens at the 58:40 minute-marker on the C-SPAN video of the breakfast, viewable here.

Later, my assistant asked if I should have intervened when sparks flew. No, I said. Our breakfasts are models of civility, but that doesn’t rule out spirited debate, or even a bit of testiness. Trumka is a feisty guy, and he was just being himself.

Our breakfast generated lots of tweets and news stories. My colleague Mark Trumbull wrote about labor’s push to elect Democrats in November. USA Today focused on Trumka’s balancing act on trade. The Washington Examiner reported Trumka’s prediction that voters would overturn Missouri’s “right to work” law Tuesday.

Most provocative was a story in Newsmax that quoted Trumka refusing to rule out an AFL-CIO endorsement of Trump in 2020. “THIS MUST BE A TYPO,” tweeted another union leader. Dave Weigel of the Washington Post, who attended the breakfast, responded via Twitter: “Trumka gave no impression whatsoever that the union could endorse Trump; he just steered around a gotcha question.” Here’s the C-SPAN clip of that moment; judge for yourself.

The Monitor Breakfast now goes on hiatus for a month, but after Labor Day, we come back with a bang: former White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Sept. 5 and Rep. Steve Stivers of Ohio, chairman of the Republican House campaign committee, on Sept. 7.

As for Trumka, the signoff was easy: “See you next year!”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.