Breakfast with the ‘referee’ of Trump economic policy

Kevin Hassett, the White House’s chief economist, talked deficits, taxes, and trade - and what it’s like to work with President Trump.

Matt Orlando/The Christian Science Monitor

As the chief White House economist, Kevin Hassett performs a very important policy role. That was reason enough to have him come speak at the Monitor Breakfast.
But I was also curious about something else: what it’s like working with President Trump.
So at our breakfast on April 26, amid all the serious discussion about deficits, taxes, and trade, I threw in this question: How often do you talk to the president?
“I’m not supposed to talk about that,” Mr. Hassett replied, smiling. But then he kept talking. “I have spoken with him many, many, many times, and I very much enjoy doing so. He really likes to be in meetings where there are a lot of different points of view.”
Hassett described the Council of Economic Advisers, which he chairs, as the “referee” on policy proposals. “Our job is to provide objective analysis, to say what the literature says, to talk about the data,” he said. At one meeting, Mr. Trump told everyone in the room to “shut up and don’t talk to Kevin before he asks a question.”
It’s those details that, for me, make the Monitor Breakfast special.
I also appreciate the regional and beat reporters at the table who shape the conversation as well. New York and New Jersey reporters zeroed in on how tax reform reduced the deductibility of state and local taxes – a big blow to many of their readers.
Jerry Zremski of The Buffalo News came away with this headline:“Trump economist blasts state efforts to limit federal taxes.” The Monitor’s Mark Trumbull aimed for a more national audience, asking Hassett about the bipartisan goal of getting more people into the labor force.
C-SPAN videotaped the entire breakfast, which can be viewed here.
About halfway through, I jumped in with another question: How does it work for Trump to have an economic team with conflicting views on trade? Hassett and Larry Kudlow, Trump’s new economic policy adviser, are both mainstream free trade conservatives, while his trade advisers are more protectionist.
Hassett pushed back a bit on my suggestion of disharmony, noting that Trump’s trade actions on China were based in part on work his shop had done, estimating the cost to the US economy of intellectual property theft from China.
“The idea that everything that everybody in the trade space wants to do is hated by a subset of the team is not accurate,” Hassett said. But, he hastened to add, “we certainly have other things that we debate.”
When Hassett’s appointment was rumored last year, even liberal economists applauded. They may disagree with him on policy, but they see him as a serious thinker. He has a PhD in economics from the University of Pennsylvania and has been a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute since 1997. No stranger to Republican politics, he advised the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney.
But Hassett’s current job is not about politics, it’s about economics. He has a staff of about 50 people, most of whom come from academia. “Probably three-quarters of them, I don’t know their political party,” he says.
This was Hassett’s first visit to our breakfast, but he knows the Monitor well and knows that we’re all about old-fashioned civility. Still, he invited us to be “as aggressive as you like.”
Of course, it’s possible to have both: tough questions, delivered in a respectful tone. I’d say we succeeded.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Breakfast with the ‘referee’ of Trump economic policy
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today