On tax reform, Trump looks to avoid the same fate as health care

At a Monitor breakfast with reporters, Trump's liaison to Congress says they've 'learned lessons' from the health care defeat - and are hoping to win some Democratic votes.

Michael BonfigliThe Christian Science Monitor
Marc Short, assistant to the president and director of the Office of Legislative Affairs speaks at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast for reporters at the St. Regis Hotel on Sept. 12 in Washington, D.C.

As President Trump and Republicans on the Hill move toward their next big goal – overhauling the tax code by the end of the year – the White House is taking a different approach than it did with health care reform, which went down to an embarrassing defeat this summer for lack of Republican votes.

Instead of allowing GOP leaders to determine the details of the legislation, the president is aggressively pushing for his stipulation that the corporate tax rate come down to 15 percent. He believes that will increase US competitiveness globally, and create jobs.

Republicans on the Hill have said this is unaffordable, with House Speaker Paul Ryan (R) of Wisconsin saying that meeting or beating the average corporate rate of 22.5 percent for industrialized countries is more realistic.

But the president’s legislative director, Marc Short, said at a Monitor breakfast with reporters on Tuesday that 15 percent is “best” and will create the most jobs. Getting this rate as a part of a legislative overhaul is more important than another point of disagreement with congressional Republicans – corporate expensing methods.

“It doesn’t help ourselves to negotiate against ourselves,” said Mr. Short, who has considerable experience on the Hill as a former senior Republican aide. He said that while ultimately "there's probably compromise" necessary to get a deal, "we think that what's best for the American people is a 15 percent corporate rate right now."

Another key difference from the health care process: The White House has been consulting with various conservative groups in advance of any legislative plan. Over the summer, said Short, the White House was engaging with outside groups such as the Club for Growth to avoid the kind of blowback from conservatives that hit GOP “repeal and replace” efforts early on.

“That is a lesson learned,” he said.

Still, this outreach has not stopped criticism among Hill conservatives, who complain that they have yet to see a detailed tax plan emerge from negotiations between key GOP leaders on the Hill and the White House.

Short said that a plan would be released in days, not weeks, and that members would have a chance to see it before they vote on a budget resolution – a necessary legislative precursor to tax reform.

Republicans plan to use a budgetary process that would allow them to pass tax reform with a majority-only vote in both chambers.

That’s the same process they used to try to pass a health-care plan without any Democratic votes. It is far from clear that they will do any better with tax reform, given that heavy lifts like this usually need bipartisan votes to pass.

Short, acknowledging that Republican support in the Senate for repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act was “not reliable,” said the president wants bipartisan backing for a tax package, and that’s why the White House has been meeting with some Democrats as well as Republicans. "We don't feel like we can assume that we can get tax reform done strictly on a partisan basis," he said.

Despite the president’s emphasis on a middle-class tax cut, however, Democrats object to tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and other aspects of the president’s broad framework. 

On another big issue – immigration – Short said the White House will be laying out a set of priorities relating to the so-called “Dreamers” within a couple of weeks.

Last week, the president announced he was unwinding President Obama’s “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” program, known as DACA. The program applies to young undocumented adults brought into the country as children and allows them to live and work in the United States without fear of deportation.

On the Hill, it’s assumed that the two parties will have to strike a deal that gives Republicans enhanced border security and Democrats a law that codifies DACA, which was done through executive action. But Short did not insist on such a deal, saying the White House doesn’t want to “bind” itself into any particular legislative construct.

Still, he laid out the elements of immigration reform that are important to the president: border enforcement – including a physical barrier, interior enforcement, and a merit-based immigration system.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to On tax reform, Trump looks to avoid the same fate as health care
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today