EPA administrator: 'We're going to keep reducing greenhouse gas emissions'

The Environmental Protection Agency plans to finalize rules to curb methane emissions from the oil and gas sector this spring, EPA administrator Gina McCarthy said Tuesday.

Michael Bonfigli/the Christian Science Monitor
EPA administrator Gina McCarthy speaks with reporters at a Monitor Breakfast in Washington, D.C., Tuesday, April 5, 2016.

This spring, the Environmental Protection Agency plans to finalize rules to curb methane emissions from the oil and gas sector, EPA administrator Gina McCarthy said at a breakfast for reporters sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor Tuesday.

Methane, the main component of natural gas, is of special concern, advocates for climate change say, because it traps planet-warming heat around 80 times faster than carbon dioxide. Last month, the EPA announced that it planned to expand its regulations of methane emissions.

“You will see that these rules continue our commitment to achieve the US goal of reducing methane emissions by 40 to 45 percent below 2012 levels,” Ms. McCarthy said. “We’re going to be moving that forward.”

Experts say a small number of oil and gas facilities are responsible for most methane leaks in the United States. Left over fluids from hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”), a method for extracting natural gas, have some of the highest levels of methane.

But methane emissions have proven challenging to measure. On Tuesday, the administrator said the EPA would carry out an information collection request to help accurately determine the extent of emissions throughout the country.

She also emphasized the need to cut emissions from other sources of greenhouse gas, such as agriculture and livestock production and food waste.

“We’re doing some really neat things, like the food recovery challenge, which is looking at how we address the overall UN [United Nations] goal that we embraced to try to reduce food waste,” McCarthy said. “That is a significant strategy for methane reduction as well.”

The EPA also has been in conversations with faith leaders about what they can do to fight climate change, McCarthy said.

“We thought it would be a nice opportunity for us to talk with faith leaders about how they can reduce greenhouse gases, in this case methane, by looking at how they work with their community and divert what would otherwise be wasted food to food pantries,” she said.

Underlining some of the EPA’s most recent successes, the administrator pointed to a new rule for oil refineries.

“The refinery rule was actually quite a remarkable accomplishment because it looked at sources of emissions from refineries that we had not regulated before and got more stringent on the ones we’ve regulated,” said McCarthy.

The agency helped develop a technology that was inexpensive and effective at ensuring that communities living around refineries are protected, McCarthy said.

“This is a clear indication that new technologies are allowing us to do a much better job,” she noted.

During the breakfast, she also lauded President Obama's leadership in calling attention to climate change.

“I think the president has brought visibility to this issue in a way that no president has before by being so embracing of the science and so clear about the breadth of the threat that climate poses,” she said.

On Thursday, McCarthy will travel to Ottawa, Canada, to discuss how the US and Canada can cooperate in the fight against climate change.

“We’re going to keep moving forward on climate change,” McCarthy said. “We’re going to keep reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.