Ex-Im Bank chief is 'confident' Congress will renew bank's charter

The US Export-Import Bank's ability to make new loans is set to expire June 30. Conservative Republicans oppose reauthorization, saying, among other things, that the private sector could fulfill the bank's role.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Fred Hochberg, chairman and president of the Export-Import Bank of the United States speaks at a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters in Washington, D.C., on June 12.

US Export-Import Bank chairman and president Fred Hochberg says he is confident Congress will vote to renew the bank’s charter before it expires June 30, despite opposition from conservative Republicans.

“I am still confident that we are going to get reauthorized,” Mr. Hochberg told a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters. The bank guarantees loans for US companies that sell products overseas.

“The fact that we create jobs, we send money to the Treasury, and 90 percent of our customers are small business are compelling arguments,” he said. Last year the bank returned $675 million in profits.

“We need more trade agreements,” Hochberg said, referring to President Obama’s battle to win congressional approval of fast-track negotiating powers called trade promotion authority (TPA) and of a massive Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement with a dozen Pacific Rim countries. But the bank’s chief executive said he thought Ex-Im would be reauthorized regardless of the outcome of those other trade battles.

The chairman acknowledged he was not certain Congress would reauthorize the bank before the June 30 expiration of its ability to make new loans. “I am going to leave the legislative strategy and tactics to people on the Hill,” he said. One frequently discussed scenario is that reauthorization of the bank will be tied to a must-pass congressional measure this summer funding highway construction.

Hochberg disclosed that this week he had lobbied House majority leader Kevin McCarthy (R) of California and House Financial Services Committee chair Jeb Hensarling (R) of Texas. Both are on record opposing Ex-Im reauthorization.

Representative McCarty told "Fox News Sunday" anchor Chris Wallace, “I think Ex-Im Bank is ... something government does not have to be involved in. The private sector can do it." Representative Hensarling wrote in National Review that the bank is about entrenching trade barriers, “not to mention providing a form of corporate welfare to the top 50 members of the Fortune 500 companies, and functional foreign aid to the likes of China and Russia.”

Hochberg said he met with Hensarling on Wednesday and had a long conversation with McCarthy on Thursday. “We talked about some of their concerns regarding Ex-Im,” Hochberg said. “I am looking for a solution. I am looking to forge and to find common ground.”

If the bank stops making new loans for a significant amount of time, Hochberg said the result would be “you will see layoffs, you will see lost business, and ... we are already seeing foreign governments and foreign companies taking advantage of the uncertainty.”

Some conservatives, like Rep. Jim Jordan (R) of Ohio, take a different view. If the bank is not reauthorized, “the sky will not fall. The seas will not rise. In fact, in my view, and in the view of many economists, quite the opposite will happen,” he said in a statement. “The expiration of the Bank’s charter will mean that companies doing business overseas will reorient themselves away from Washington and towards market signals. The Bank’s absence will make our economy stronger.”

On Friday the bank released its annual report on competition in the global credit markets. It found that competition has “ramped up markedly for US exporters.” Only about a third of other governments’ trade financing activities abide by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) rules that Ex-Im follows. That level of compliance with the OECD standards is down from 100 percent in 1999.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Ex-Im Bank chief is 'confident' Congress will renew bank's charter
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today