EPA chief Gina McCarthy to GOP Congress: bring it on

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said Monday that Americans want President Obama to take action on climate change. But a GOP challenge to the administration’s carbon-cutting policies is expected.

Michael Bonfigli / The Christian Science Monitor
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy speaks at the St. Regis Hotel on Monday in Washington, DC.

President Obama won’t budge on his climate agenda, the head of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says, even as the incoming GOP Congress gears up to fight Mr. Obama on EPA regulations.

“I feel very confident that the president has the best interests of the EPA in mind, and he’s made very clear what his priorities are,” EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said at a breakfast hosted by The Christian Science Monitor Monday. “There may be challenges ahead, but the president will do the right thing.”

The Obama administration has made climate change a priority in the second term, and EPA is doing much of the lifting through its authority to regulate climate-warming emissions.

But a GOP challenge to the administration’s carbon-cutting policies is expected. Under next year’s GOP Senate, EPA will face increasing scrutiny from Republicans who blast Obama’s environmental regulations as job-killing and excessive.

Incoming Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) has signaled that one of his top priorities will be fighting proposed EPA rules that Republicans fear would shutter coal-fired power plants. Target No. 1 is EPA’s forthcoming Clean Power Plan, which would cut US emissions 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030.

Senator McConnell has indicated that Republicans may target EPA regulations by including language in must-pass spending bills that would restrict the EPA. That would force Obama either to accept scaled-back EPA rules and pass the spending bills or to veto the legislation and create a budget showdown.

“The American people spoke against the President's climate policies in this last election,” Sen. James Inhofe (R) of Oklahoma said in a statement last week. “As we enter a new Congress, I will do everything in my power to rein in and shed light on the EPA's unchecked regulations.”

Senator Inhofe, one of Capitol Hill’s biggest climate change skeptics, is expected to chair the subcommittee overseeing the EPA.

Obama’s latest climate actions include a breakthrough deal with China, committing the United States to bolder emissions cuts and committing China to peak its emissions by 2030. And over the weekend at the G20 summit in Australia, the president pledged the US would contribute $3 billion to help poor countries adapt to climate change.

Given those promises, Obama will probably push back on GOP efforts to roll back EPA rules. According to Ms. McCarthy, Americans expect action on climate change out of Obama.

“When you survey folks, they’re worried about climate change and they want us to do something,” she told reporters.

Republicans say the GOP’s success in the midterm elections is a signal that Americans want Congress and the president to focus on creating jobs – not on cutting carbon.

"The House will continue to fight this administration's cavalier approach of jamming through harmful regulations without regard to economic consequences," House majority leader Kevin McCarthy (R) of California said in a statement.

Last week Republicans questioned the impact of the US-China climate deal. Inhofe called the agreement a “non-binding charade.” McConnell called it “unrealistic” and said it allows China to do nothing for the next 16 years until 2030.

Administrator McCarthy says GOP criticism ignores the significance of a China climate deal.

“The commitment of China is a big step forward,” she said. “China has never put an absolute reduction on the table. The commitment they have made [to peak emissions by 2030] ... really does require immediate action.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.