GOP Party chairman: Obama executive amnesty is 'a nuclear threat'

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus called the president’s pledge to take executive action on immigration by year’s end without waiting for Congress to act 'a nuclear threat to reject the basis of the separation power doctrine.'

Michael Bonfigli/Special to the Christian Science Monitor
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus speaks at the St. Regis Hotel on Nov. 7 in Washington, DC.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus says he hopes Hillary Clinton is the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in 2016 but admits his party’s operations will need to be “about perfect” to beat her.

Republican gains in Tuesday’s election in the Senate, House, and governor’s races showed “the acceptance of conservative Republican leadership across the board,” Mr. Priebus argued. 

Buoyed by the results, Priebus told a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters that he was “leaning to do it again” and run for a third term as party chair. He was first elected in 2011 and re-elected in 2013.

Priebus also appeared to toughen his party’s stance on comprehensive immigration reform.

He called the president’s pledge to take executive action on immigration by year’s end without waiting for Congress to act “a nuclear threat to reject the basis of the separation power doctrine.” The chairman said Republicans “will have to convene about whatever possible options we have to stop it, whether it be the courts, whether it will be legislation.” 

After the 2012 election, Priebus commissioned a study on why the party failed to win the White House. The “Growth and Opportunity Project” called for the party to “embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform.” But Priebus said the president’s promise to act on his own has “created a situation that I think may have not existed before” and has “galvanized the country in a place where I don’t believe most people are interested in comprehensive immigration reform unless they are convinced that the border is secure.”

Republicans hope to run against Clinton given what Priebus said was her lackluster performance helping candidates in 2014.

“I sure as heck hope we’re running against Hillary Clinton,” he said. “‘What you just saw on Tuesday night is about as flat of a performance that you could have ever seen from the Democratic Party’s brightest star.” For example, both Bill and Hillary Clinton campaigned in their home state of Arkansas for Sen. Mark Pryor, who was defeated by Rep. Tom Cotton.

A Clinton candidacy would also energize Republican voters. 

Priebus was candid about the challenges his party would face in 2016 taking the White House given the larger voter turnout in presidential elections. “We’ve got a long way to go to be ready for 2016,” he said. “We’ve got to be about perfect as a national party to win a national cultural vote in this country. I think the Democrats can be good and win, but we have to be great.”

To that end, Priebus said he plans to have a “full blown field operation” up and running by March 2015 in the key states of Florida, Ohio, and Virginia. For the election just past, the GOP made a two-year, $100 million investment in identifying and reaching out to potential Republican voters. In the coming presidential election, Priebus said the data effort would need to be “three times bigger than we were in 2014. I think it is going to take a massive amount of money and a huge paid program in the battleground states starting immediately.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to GOP Party chairman: Obama executive amnesty is 'a nuclear threat'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today