Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, author of 'Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War,' speaks at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington Jan. 17, 2014, at a breakfast hosted by The Christian Science Monitor.

Robert Gates: In Iraq, US achieved its 'minimal objectives'

Meeting with reporters Friday, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the US accomplished what it intended to in Iraq, but thinks it could push the leadership to do a better job governing the Sunnis.

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates says America accomplished what it intended to in Iraq, despite the growing violence on the ground there. 

“We achieved the objectives that I thought were important in 2008,” Mr. Gates said at a press breakfast sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor Friday. “We handed the Iraqis a fragile democracy, a stable country, and a high degree of security essentially on a silver platter.” 

With that done, Gates added, America was able to “withdraw our troops without that withdrawal being seen as a strategic defeat for the United States with global consequences.”

The mistakes that have since been made by Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki have included isolating Sunnis in a country dominated by a Shiite-led government and “treating the Sunnis in such a hostile manner over the last couple of years or so.” 

There has also been “spillover” from the war in Syria, which has changed the situation on the ground as well, Gates said. “Things keep moving. You can’t freeze history.” 

If he were sitting in the situation room today, Gates says, he would recommend that the US offer Maliki “a wide range of military assistance,” including both equipment and training, and condition it on his outreach to Sunnis. 

This would include making investments in the western Iraq province of Anbar where the increase in violence has been the most sharp since Al Qaeda forces launched an offensive on Jan. 1.

The point, Gates said, is to “give the Sunnis some reason to believe that this government in Baghdad does represent them, [and] is better than any alternative.” 

They need to be given a reason to cooperate with the Maliki government, Gates said. “I don’t think they’ll throw in with Al Qaeda. But [Maliki] has got to give them a reason to want to help and be constructive.”

Had the United States been able to maintain a residual force in Iraq – rather than leave because Maliki refused to grant US troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts if they were accused of, for example, accidentally killing civilians – US military commanders may have been able to have greater leverage to convene the leadership in Iraq. 

The size of the residual force “really wouldn’t have mattered,” Gates said.

“Whether it was over dinner or for meetings,” Gates said, “They could bring these guys together in a way that they might not be able to on their own initiative and in essence force them to look at each other and talk to each other and have this mediating role by the United States,” he added. “I think that role is largely absent.” 

Still, Gates argues, from his perspective the US withdrawal went as planned. “In terms of handing over Iraq to the Iraqis I think we accomplished our minimal objectives.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Robert Gates: In Iraq, US achieved its 'minimal objectives'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today