What keeps Janet Napolitano up at night? People with keyboards up to no good

In a post-9/11 world, the two top concerns facing the Department of Homeland Security are cyber and aviation threats, said Secretary Janet Napolitano during a Monitor-sponsored breakfast.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Janet Napolitano, secretary of Homeland Security, speaks at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington, D.C. She was a guest at the March 26 Monitor Breakfast.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's department has 240,000 employees; they're in every state and 75 countries. She was the guest at a March 26 Monitor Breakfast.

Controversy about the TSA's decision to allow small knives on planes:

"It is the right decision from a security standpoint. We're trying to prevent a bomb from getting on a plane.... Where we could have done better ... was a little more legislative and public outreach...."

Why she keeps other post-9/11 rules:

"The reality is the aviation threat has not gone away. When ... people say, 'What are the threats you are confronting?,' I always identify two – aviation and cyber. That is where we have seen operational activity. That is where we have seen pre-operational activity."

The state of border security:

"You can always go down to the [Mexican] border and find somebody who is unhappy.... What we are saying is that the border is more secure now than it has ever been....

Why she does not use e-mail in her job:

"I think e-mail just sucks up time. You are all nodding and laughing, but you know I speak truth."

What keeps her up at night:

"What occasionally keeps me up at night ... is what is out there that I don't know about – some operation that I haven't seen, some threat that hasn't become evident, some new mechanism or technique ... being used by cyber malefactors from around the world."

Talk she is considering a run for president:

"[That] would be the kind of thing that would keep me up at night, and I lose enough sleep as it is."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.