Rep. Sander Levin: ‘Dribble by dribble’ approach undermines tax reform

Dragging out negotiations on the debt ceiling could potentially harm the US and global economies, not to mention tax and entitlement reforms, says Rep. Sander Levin (D) of Michigan.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Rep. Sander Levin, ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, speaks at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 15.

Rep. Sander Levin (D) of Michigan is the ranking Democrat on the tax-writing House Committee on Ways and Means. He was the guest at the Jan. 15 Monitor breakfast.

Results if Congress does not raise the ceiling on the government's debt:

"The consequences would be ... dramatic and ... potentially cataclysmic.... Those who say, 'OK, let's toy with that,' they are toying with the American economy, and they are toying with the global economy."

The need for additional revenue in any effort to deal with $109 billion in automatic spending cuts (or sequestration) due March 1:

"You cannot address sequestration simply through cuts.... This is not a question of starving the beast; this is a question of ... whether we are going to starve not the beast but necessary programs."

Prospects for tax reform after Congress deals with sequestration and the debt ceiling:

"I'm hopeful, if we don't drag [a debt-ceiling fix] out.... Those who are saying, let's do it dribble by dribble, they're the ones who would be undermining the effort to sit down and have a serious discussion on tax reform and the entitlements."

Medicare's fee for service approach to paying doctors:

"Fee for service is not a feasible structure for the present or the future.... I would like to engage all of my colleagues in how we accelerate the move from fee for service, which I think in the long term is going to be how we best get hold of health-care costs."

Income inequality in the United States:

"For the last 10, 15, 20 years the middle class of this country has essentially been treading water while there has been a tipping of the balance in favor of higher-income groups.... That tipping has not been promotional of economic growth."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.