Florida Sen. Marco Rubio calls on Attorney General Holder to resign

A rising Republican star and the lone GOP Hispanic in the US Senate, Marco Rubio says Congress has reached a 'point of no return' with the embattled attorney general.

Michael Bonfigli / The Christian Science Monitor
Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida (second from right) speaks at a Monitor-sponsored breakfast for reporters on June 21 at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida called on US Attorney General Eric Holder to resign Thursday.

Speaking at a Monitor-hosted breakfast, the freshman senator was responding to the Obama administration’s decision Wednesday to claim executive privilege in refusing to hand over Justice Department documents to a congressional committee investigating a failed anti-gun-trafficking operation.

“I think we’ve about reached the point of no return on this issue,” Senator Rubio said Thursday, after replying “yes” to a reporter’s question on whether he believes Mr. Holder should step down. “I think they’ve been given multiple opportunities to answer very legitimate questions that the Congress has.”

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted along party lines Wednesday to find Holder in contempt over the refusal to turn over certain documents on Operation Fast and Furious, a move Democrats – including Holder – decried as politically motivated.

The claim of executive privilege by the Obama administration escalated the conflict with committee chairman Darrell Issa (R) of California, who launched an investigation into the Phoenix-based “gun-walking” operation in the spring of 2011.

Rubio, a rising Republican star, joins presumptive GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, at least five other senators, and more than 125 members of the House in demanding that Holder step down.

“We know for a fact that something they told the Congress was not true,” Rubio said. “And now I think it’s very legitimate for the Congress to enquire as to why we were told something that wasn’t true, and they refuse to provide materials to prove that.”

Rubio wasn’t specific on the issue of falsehoods. Though it is known that last year, a Justice Department official asserted in a letter to lawmakers that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms had not knowingly allowed illegally purchased guns to be trafficked into Mexico, then retracted the claim 10 months later. On Wednesday, the Justice Department retracted a statement that Holder had made to the Senate Judiciary Committee during a hearing last week, when he claimed to have been briefed about similar gunwalking tactics used in the Bush administration by then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey. That claim had been made "inadvertently," the Justice Department said, in a letter.

Rubio said he believed the House had provided Holder with adequate opportunities in which to answer questions without endangering the government’s ability to operate.

“Invoking executive privilege at the 11th hour yesterday was probably the last straw in that regard, and I think we’re now at the point of no return,” Rubio said. “I don’t know how the attorney general can continue to exercise that office with any level of credibility after the decision that was made yesterday.”

The claim of executive privilege was the first of President Obama’s tenure.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.