Recall survivor Gov. Scott Walker extends half an olive branch to unions

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, recall election behind him, says fight over collective bargaining was about money, not unions, and that 'right-to-work' legislation is something he is 'not going to do.'

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) speaks at a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters in Washington, D.C,. on Thursday.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), survivor of a recall election last week, sought to clarify his motive for eliminating collective bargaining rights for many state workers in 2011, saying the fight "wasn't about unions" so much as about fiscal responsibility. He also said, again, that he does not intend to pursue right-to-work legislation, which labor leaders see as akin to union-busting. 

But his tone was not all sweetness and light, as he took credit for setting the reset button on state and union balance of power in Wisconsin government. Labor leaders never believed "anyone would ever dare to make the changes we did," he said Thursday at a Monitor-sponsored breakfast for reporters. For too long, "they intimidated local officials into never daring to make tough decisions."

The reform agenda he and the Republican majority in the Wisconsin Legislature pushed through early last year eliminated collective bargaining rights for public-sector unions except police and firefighters. The agenda brought hundreds of thousands of protesters to Madison, the state capital, for months, and motivated the recall challenge that resulted in last week's election.

Walker has long said those reforms were needed to eliminate the state's $3.6 billion budget deficit without tax hikes or widespread layoffs. Unions held sway for so long in Wisconsin, he said Thursday, because no previous governor had challenged them. Still, media reports after his June 5 victory "overstated" the blow it represented for public-sector unions in Wisconsin, he said. 

Walker also said right-to-work legislation is something he is “not going to do,” noting he would not have support for pursuing such a bill. Such legislation would ban negotiation between a union and company if nonunion members are forced to pay fees for representation.

His statement Thursday was the firmest yet on the issue. In a televised debate held days before the recall, he demurred when asked if he would veto a right-to-work bill, saying only that it was a moot issue because the bill is "not going to get there."

Republicans often promote right-to-work laws as a job-creation tool that states can use to help attract businesses; they also say it gives workers a choice on whether they want to commit to union dues. Democrats see the legislation as a backhanded method of weakening unions.

During the recall election campaign, the prospect of right-to-work legislation was often cited by Walker's challenger, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett

“One of the ten commandments of the far right is you have to be against unions. You have to be in favor of right-to-work," Mr. Barrett said in the debate. Walker "would fall from grace with the far right if he said he would veto [a right-to-work bill], so he can't.” 

With the recall now in the past, Walker said his single regret is not spending enough time explaining to voters the reasoning behind his budget-cutting agenda early in his term.

“I was so eager. I fixed it, then talked about it. In the future, I’m going to do both,” he said.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Recall survivor Gov. Scott Walker extends half an olive branch to unions
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today