Democrats' campaign chief: US House is 'in range' for takeover

Rep. Steve Israel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, says Dems have moved within striking distance for winning control of the US House in Election 2012.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Rep. Steve Israel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, spoke at a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters in Washington, D.C. on May 10.

Rep. Steve Israel of New York is chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which seeks to elect Democrats to the House of Representatives. He was the guest at the May 10 Monitor breakfast in Washington.

Democrats' chances of gaining 25 seats, the number needed to win back the House:

"We have gone from deep on our own 20-yard line. We have moved the ball to their 20-yard line.... This thing is in range ... I am telling you, razor-close."

How President Obama's stance in support of gay marriage will affect House races:

"I just don't think it is going to be a huge dynamic in specific congressional races because our candidates reflect the priorities and the values of the districts in which they are running."

Response to an assertion from Republican campaign chief Rep. Pete Sessions [see previous Monitor Breakfast] that many Democratic candidates don't want to be seen with Mr. Obama:

"The question is whether Mitt Romney wants to appear with any House Republicans.... Has Pete taken a look at the polling on House Republicans lately?"

Impact of "super political-action committees" in the 2012 elections:

"I am concerned about the effect of super PACs in this election.... We didn't lose the House in 2010 to House Republicans. We lost it to Karl Rove and the Koch brothers."

Message from West Virginia's Democratic presidential primary, in which a federal inmate won 41 percent of the vote:

"There may have been some anxiety over the president's position on coal, and it manifested itself. But I promise you that that candidate is not a threat to President Obama's reelection chances."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.