Royal baby news: How the Obamas react to Kate Middleton pregnancy

White House hails as 'welcome' the news that Prince William and Kate Middleton are expecting their first child. The Obamas met the young royals soon after the couple was married in spring 2011.

Arthur Edwards/Reuters/File
Britain's Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge is seen meeting James William Davies, the five month old son of Tessa Davies (r.) who was named after Prince William, following a visit to the Guildhall in Cambridge, central England in November.

Fiscal cliff? Syria? White House spokesman Jay Carney was on the verge of taking his first serious question at Monday’s briefing, when he remembered he had something far more joyous to discuss: the news from London that the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, is expecting.

“Oh, wait. I have one more thing I wanted to mention,” Mr. Carney said, after reciting the presidential rundown for the day. “And that is that on behalf of everyone here in the White House, beginning with the president and the first lady, we extend our congratulations to the duke and duchess of Cambridge on the welcome news this morning out of London that they are expecting their first child.”

Carney was asked if the Obamas have any advice for the parents-to-be. He said he hadn’t had that conversation with them. “But,” he added, “I know they both feel that having a child is one of the most wonderful parts of their lives, so I'm sure that will be the same for the duke and duchess of Cambridge.”

In what People magazine described as their first royal duty since their wedding on April 29, 2011, the duke and duchess of Cambridge met briefly with the Obamas in May of last year at Buckingham Palace. The young royals were looking ahead to their tour of the US last summer. Now they have an expanding family to look forward to. According to press reports, the duchess’s pregnancy is at an early stage.

And at the White House, Carney threw in another baby announcement, this one about a commoner.

“I also want to congratulate Brian Deese of the NEC [National Economic Council] and his wife on the birth of their child, Adeline Sutton Deese, over the weekend,” Carney said. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.